Forum
{{ post.commentCount }}

Didn't find anything.

{{ searchResult.errors[0] }}



fifa 14 top 50 players
Enjoyneer_RED 11 years ago
Manchester United, England 43 257

1 - L.MESSI, 94
2 - C.RONALDO, 92
3 - F.RIBERY, 90
4 - FALCAO, 90
5 - INIESTA, 89
6 - R.VAN PERSIE, 89
7 - XAVI, 89
8 - IBRAHIMOVIC, 89
9 - ROBBEN, 88
10 - SCHWEINSTEIGER, 88
11 - S.AGUERO, 88
12 - DAVID SILVA, 88
13 - ROONEY, 87
14 - LAHM, 87
15 - VIDIC, 87
16 - THIAGO SILVA, 87
17 - G.BALE, 87
18 - OZIL, 87
19 - MATA, 87
20 - CAVANI, 87
21 - BUFFON, 86
22 - CASSILAS, 86
23 - PIRLO, 86
24 - TOURE, 86
25 - CHIELLINI, 86
26 - KOMPNY, 86
27 - TEVEZ - 86
28 - GOMEZ - 86
29 - PIQUE - 86
30 - S.RAMOS - 86
31 - FABREGAS - 86
32 - NEUER, 86
33 - SUAREZ, 86
34 - DI MARIA, 86
35 - LEWANDOWSKI, 86
36 - A.COLE, 86
37 - XABI ALONSO, 86
38 - CECH, 85
39 - JESUS NAVAS, 85
40 - SANTI CAZORLA, 85
41 - LAVEZZI, 85
42 - BENZEMA, 85
43 - MODRIC, 85
44 - HUMMELS, 85
45 - VIDAL, 85
46 - HAZARD, 85
47 - MARCO REUS, 85
48 - PEDRO, 85
49 - S. BUSQUETS, 85
50 - T.MULLER, 85

what do you guys think?
is there anyone ranked too high or too low, is there someone missing on this list?

link ( <http://www.easports.com/fifa/news-updates-gameplay/article/fifa-14-top-50>)

0
Comments
TheGame 11 years ago
Manchester United 104 1380

De Gea: 85
Rafael: 83
Evra: 84
Jones: 82
Ferdinand: 84
Evans: 81
Anderson: 80
Rooney: 87
Giggs: 78
Smalling: 80
Lindegard: 76
Chicharito: 82
Vidic: 87
Carrick: 86
Nani: 83
Young: 80
Welbeck: 83
RVP: 89
Cleverley: 82
Valencia: 84
Kagawa: 82
Fellaini: 84
Buttner: 79

IMO

0
Dynastian98 11 years ago
Real Madrid 483 7140

^ Soon you'll see why Shinji Kagawa is so much more than an 82... ;)

As long as he plays AM of course. :P
Winger isn't his position.

0
quikzyyy 11 years ago
Arsenal 429 9010

damn, what the hell is EA smoking?

0
Vendetta 11 years ago
Chelsea FC, Egypt 202 3025

A lot of you guys are quite bias with your ratings of your own teams to be honest :P

1
TheGame 11 years ago
Manchester United 104 1380

@Dynastian98, he just needs more playing time. Period. He can handle playing on the wings anyways, like he did at the confederations cup.

0
Dynastian98 11 years ago
Real Madrid 483 7140

@Ven

Just out of curiosity, which ones are biased for me? I'm just curious because I literally won't know (being a RM fan). :P

@TheGame

But Kagawa's best position is AM. That is where his attributes are best used. Especially at United, you have Nani and Valencia on both sides of him and RVP in front of him, and he will be amazing. That's how he did it at Dortmund and got Ferguson's attention in the first place. :)

0
TheGame 11 years ago
Manchester United 104 1380

@Dynastian98, no doubt that is his best position and right now is the best time to utilize him since Rooney is injured. My point is if Rooney is playing, I would rather have him playing behind RVP and put Shinji out wide. Rooney is a better AM, capable of winning matches by himself. I don't think Kagawa is quite there yet.

0
Dynastian98 11 years ago
Real Madrid 483 7140

@TheGame

It would quite the situation if he could displace Rooney as an AM... ;)

0
Vendetta 11 years ago
Chelsea FC, Egypt 202 3025

@Dynastian: You're actually the one with the least bias. The ones I find bias in RM ratings is Casillas at 87 (that's better than Neur, Cech, Buffon and Lloris) and Illarramendi at 79.

Someone like @TheGame or @Alex though have more bias though. Welbeck at 83? Vidic at 87? Smalling at 80? Van Ginkel at 84? Willian at 87? Bertrand at 80? Those are some bias ratings.

0
Dynastian98 11 years ago
Real Madrid 483 7140

@Ven

Well, the Casillas at 87 one I guess is quite biased. So now that you pointed that out, I'd probably put him at 85.

But I think Illarra is fine. 79 seems a just rating for him.

0
ramaboy10 11 years ago
Mauritius 285 6463

Alex your ratings are so biased. KDB 85? Come on, 82-83 is more realistic. Mata 89? 88-87 is a bit more fair.. I don't watch Chelsea much but I don't think he is on the same level as Ibrahimovich and Iniesta. And so on...

1
AlexBatak 11 years ago
Chelsea, Italy 204 2707

I think those who support La Liga don't know much about the EPL at all or watch all the matches just like what Dynastian98 said "you don't watch the EPL, so refrain from commenting or criticizing it.. No, I'm not being biased maybe I gave KDB a one more rating yeah but he definitely deserve an 83/84 at least and not 80.

Maybe I'm overreacting here, but EA underrates the EPL so much, it's the first year they at least consider Cech a better GK than Valdes or give A.Cole a good rating.

Hazard was in TOTS so in EA's Logic he deserves a downgrade.. I came to conclusion that they adjust The EPL ratings randomly, looking at the Long shots, Heading Accuracy, Acceleration etc. The only fans that never complained about EA ratings are mostly La Liga fans, especially Barcelona and Real Madrid fans.

Manchester United, Chelsea, Tottenham, Arsenal, Manchester City & Liverpool at least deserves to have an accurate players rating but they are too lazy to watch the EPL. There must be a program to track all the players moves and actions on the pitch but looking at the stats I don't see the EA bothered much about it.

1
tdot2barca 11 years ago
Assyriska FF, Brazil 35 956

These are horrible ratings. Fabregas 86? Cmon..

0
TheGame 11 years ago
Manchester United 104 1380

@Vendetta, I stand by the ratings I've put for my team. Don't talk about bias if you're putting Courtois at 86. At the end of the day, I finished my ratings by stating that these are in my opinion. This is by no means a completely objective rating. You don't like it, don't read it!

0
tdot2barca 11 years ago
Assyriska FF, Brazil 35 956

@Alex

Not trying to offend you but your ratings are extremely overrated. Mata is not better than Ozil or Fabregas. Maybe he is Chelsea's best player but that doesn't make him on the same level as Iniesta, Fabregas, Xavi, Schweini, Ozil, etc.

0
Vendetta 11 years ago
Chelsea FC, Egypt 202 3025

@Dynastian: I guess I was a bit harsh with the Illarra rating but I just find that he is rated highly only for his high price-tag. If he was still at Sociedad, I feel he would be the same rating as our very own, Marco Van Ginkel.

0
AlexBatak 11 years ago
Chelsea, Italy 204 2707

@tdot2barca It's fine mate, that's your opinion :) But not in my book though. just because you don't watch the EPL it doesn't mean that those players are better.

@TheGame I actually think that you underrated your team haha :)) Chicharito deserves an 84 rating at least.

0
tdot2barca 11 years ago
Assyriska FF, Brazil 35 956

I'll do one for Barca:

Valdes - 84
Pinto - 75

Montoya - 78
Dani Alves - 83
Puyol - 85
Pique - 85
Mascherano - 84
Jordi Alba - 82
Adriano - 80
Bartra - 76

Busquets - 86
Xavi - 90
Iniesta - 91
Fabregas - 89
Song - 82
Sergi Roberto - 77

Messi - 95
Neymar - 84
Sanchez - 82
Pedro - 83
Tello - 80

0
tdot2barca 11 years ago
Assyriska FF, Brazil 35 956

@ Alex

Who said I don't watch the EPL?

0
Vendetta 11 years ago
Chelsea FC, Egypt 202 3025

@TheGame:

"Don't talk about bias if you're putting Courtois at 86."

I speak for all La Liga fans when I say that Courtois was the La Liga's best keeper last season. Conceding only 28 goals with Atletico; a club that isn't even considered the big two of the La Liga. He single handedley saved Atletico Madrid in the Copa Del Rey final with a brilliant performance. To add more to his fantastic season, he smashed the record for the longest time not conceding a goal at home (820 minutes) and a record for the longest time not conceding a goal away (618 minutes) for Atletico. He has done far better at Atletico than De Gea has when he was there. I speak the truth when I say he deserves an 86 rating.

But Welbeck at 83? The guy was one of the most inconsistent strikers last season. Smalling at 80? The guy barely played last season. Vidic at 87? Thiago Silva is an 87, not Vidic. I respect your opinion, but I just find it extremely bias (along with Alex's ratings).

1