{{ searchResult.errors[0] }}
rescue_secure
11 years ago
chelsea! definitely! hazard is a far better player with the assists and goals hez provided while kagawa has warmed the bench!
PuppetMaster
11 years ago
so far its chelsea who got the better deal
PuppetMaster
11 years ago
but financially obviously man utd got a better deal because kagawa has the ASIAN factor which could bring more supporters to the club and jersey sale
mladen
11 years ago
we ll see at the end of season.
mladen
11 years ago
compare RVP and Hazard. Kagawa and Marin. LOL
Vendetta
11 years ago
Why would you compare a striker to a LW? And why compare a player who has only started one game for us to Kagawa? It makes it look like your downgrading Kagawa. It's an insult to him be honest.
Chanakya999
11 years ago
At the end of the EPL season, it looks like Hazard got the better deal.
Keisuke
11 years ago
We'll see next season, I can't judge now because Kagawa has been replaced in LM at Man U.
KTBFFHSWE
7 years ago
Croatian
7 years ago
So basically most of people thought Hazard won't be better than Kagawa? lol
tuan_jinn
7 years ago
lollll. I am all for Hazard now, for sure.
But Kagawa wasn't used to get to his full potential, that's the coach's big ass fault too. :D Im curious about now!
JuanMata10
7 years ago
amir_keal
7 years ago
It's 4 years ago, so it's not all that bad.
Emobot7
7 years ago
Edited
Its ok JuanMata10, we all make mistake! ;)
Its ok JuanMata10, we all make mistake!
With 50 million pounds laid off on each player to bring them into the Premier League, Did Manchester United or Chelsea get the better deal?