http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1572458-european-power-rankings-the-continents-20-best-football-clubs

1. Inter Milan (Italy)
2. Tottenham Hotspurs (England)
3. SL Benfica (Portugal)
4. FC Porto (Portugal)
5. SSC Napoli (Italy)
6. Galatasaray (Turkey)
7. Arsenal (England)
8. Manchester City (England)
9. Malaga CF (Spain)
10. Chelsea FC (England)
11. Shakhtar Donetsk (Ukraine)
12. Paris Saint-Germain (France)
13. Atletico Madrid (Spain)
14. AC Milan (Italy)
15. Borussia Dortmund (Germany)
16. Juventus (Italy)
17. Manchester United (England)
18. Real Madrid (Spain)
19. FC Barcelona (Spain)
20. Bayern Munchen (Germany)

NOTE :: Not my own judgment or writing. All info was copied and pasted from the link above.

Well guys, what do you think? Sounds like a fair list, or no?

Still I think Spurs are better

rama my opinon 

rama:
how can u place chelsea before man u? because they won that 1 match in the fa cup??

No -- because they won the CL, they beat us, they beat Munich and because its my opinion :)

Actually ramaboy united are better than chelsea. Chelsea to be honest they got lucky in the UCL final 2012. Bayern dominated chelsea they had like 17 shots to chelsea's 3, bayern did play a bit crappy but chelsea never won they drew penalty shoot out is a draw after 120 mins so i doesnt count as a win. And chelsea got lucky at camp nou too. parked the bus most of the match.

ATM IMO:

1.  FC Bayern 

1.  Barcelona
2.  Real Madrid
3.  Juventus
4.  Manchester United
5.  Borussia Dortmund
6.  PSG
7.  Atletico
8.  AC Milan
9. Valencia (first time since for ever i have to rate valencia lower than atletico and hopefully the last)
10. Malaga
11. Tottenham
12. Benfica
13. Arsenal
14. Porto
    16. Real Sociedad
    17. Leverkusen

18. Shaktar Donetsk

1. Chelsea
2. City
3. CSKA Moscow
4. Lazio
5. Inter
6. Shalke
7. Liverpool
8. Galatasaray
9. Napoli
10. Fiorentina
11. Lyon
12. Sevilla

Be fair, MRarsenal; Chelsea had about 6 of their first team unavailable because of bookings and injuries. They also played Bayern in THEIR OWN STADIUM, and managed to hang on for the equalizer and through extra time.

Against Barca, Chelsea had 10 men for most of the match, no central defenders at all, against the greatest attack in the world, and scored the two best goals of the match.

What Chelsea achieved last year was nothing short of heroic. 

And I think Spurs are better than Arsenal too. :p

I also think people are rating Juventus too highly. Of course they're great at the moment. but mainly because of their classically Italian defense. They don't deserve to be above Man United or Real.

Yeah but to beat a team with 10 men behind a ball is like impossible. Bayern also had their own injury concerns to be worried about Ribery got injured and Terry would not make a difference to the defense in fact he will make chelsea's defense worse. He's too old and slow to handle the likes of Robben, Ribery, Gomez.

And we are better than spurs, our worst squad in around 15 years to your best squad in years and still lose 5-2 successively and lose 4-1 to Inter is astonishing. 

Yeah, it's not like you got whipped 8-2 or anything, last year. :p

We had 10 men for 70 minutes in your 5-2, and you know that. Losing 4-1 to Inter may be an anomaly, but it happens.

Our defense is better, our midfield is superior, and it's only in the striker department you beat us. Something which hopefully will change in the summer. The good news for you, though, is that you no longer have to worry about anyone buying your players -- there's no-one left who is good enough for the top teams to want. 

we have better defense in league you fool. our mid is better, defense and attack only your goalie is better.

Actually we have a lot of talent more than spurs. Wilshere is wanted, Jenkinson is a future talent, cazorla is great, podolski is wantedby juventus, walcott was wanted, vermalen was wanted by barcelona, sagna is wanted and you say " we have no more good players " lol your gone full retard.

What Terry did in the semis, he had to face the consecvences.. yeah chelsea were lucky in the final and semi, had the 1 in 10 game so to say (you cant really say they draw against barca since barca had to win by 2 goals, had 1 defender on their half when the 2-2 goal was scored in the last minutes.. youd think they had scored that 2-2 if barca would defend a lead in the last minute?) 

..but the most luck was in the 2nd round against Napoli. Napoli were leadin 3-1 still dominating the game. several chances for 4-1 and one of those were a ball that was a cenitimeters from going inside of the goal-line.. also the games against Benfica.. In the 1st game benfica were robbed of a clear handball penalty and in the 2nd game benfica were maybe not dominating but was they better team even though they had several CB's out because of injury. as in the barca game befica had to push every single guy up the field when the result was 1-1..  then chelsea scored a counter

its all because of di matteos tactics 

@MRarsenal: Defense: you have dodgy center backs, a brand new left-back who makes mistakes, and a right-back is is decent but old, and wants out. We, by contrast, have one of the best CBs in the league, along with a solid partner (and a returning Kaboul), have one of the best right-backs in the league, and a left-back who would give  yours a run for your money.

Midfield we have Lennon, Bale, Dembele, Sandro and a ton of back up. You have Wilshire. That's it. Get over it.

Up front is where you win, sure, and there's no argument with that.

As for being wanted? Well, by who? You say Barcelona wanted Vermaelen, and I say LOL Yeah Right. If that's the case, why didn't you sell? ;) I'm fairly sure he'd have jumped at the chance. Who else? Wilshire? Again, who by? I can see Man United planning a swoop, but only after a couple of years when he's achieved something. 

You have a ton of 'future talent'. Very little established talent.

Just face it, your golden transfer checks are over. 

"It's all because of di Matteo's tactics"

Well, yes, and the performance of the players, too. Luck had little to do with it. Chelsea won, fair and square.

yeh barca does want vermalen but vermalen said he wants to be loyal to Arsenal.

walcott > lennon, cazorla > sigurdson, Arteta > sandro, wilshere > parker, sagna > walker, gibbs > ekotto, koscielny > koboul. even our bench is far more superior. You'd get munched by bayern munich.

" wilshere will go to man united " as if tottenham have chances of winning ucl and premier league get the F*ck out of here. Bale will soon be wearing a Madrid jersey playing alongside CR7, Benzema, ozil, Higuain, Alonso.

Tottenham has less chances of winning silverware in the next couple of years than Arsenal.

Lennon > Walcott, Sandro > Arteta, Walker > Sagna, BAE > Gibbs, BAE = Monreal, Vertonghen >Vermaelen, Kaboul/Dawson > Koscielny, Bale > Cazorla, Lloris > either of your two.

I didn't say Wilshire 'will go' to Man Utd. I said they're the only team who would be interested, and then it will need a couple of seasons for him to actually achieve anything, like RVP did. :p

You think that Bale will be gone in the summer, but Vermaelen will 'stay loyal'?

LOL.

Dude, you've gone Full Retard.

At this rate, I believe Tottenham can and will be MUCH more successful than Arsenal in the coming years if you guys don't make it in the top 4, or even if Arsenal does somehow make it in the top four.

where have all the spurs fans been ever since Redknapp took over?

As fot Spurs chances of winning silverware? Well, unlike you we're in the quarters for a Europa League. Not the top-flight, but still pretty decent. At least we won't run into the dreaded Bradford City!!! :p

thats EUROPA IDIOT. we played ucl fool BIG DIFFERENCE. BTW remember Leeds united lol