Everton 1-1 Manchester United Result, Lineups & Stats (1 Mar 2020)

Top Comments

Hekasi 7 years ago

Chelsea, England 7 764

binjai 7 years ago

0 1223

Sorry but as always, the FA, referess and especially VAR always favour Man U when they got the chance. Sigudson was sitting on the floor, how the hell he interfered the GK. fuck EPL VAR team.

Lambo91 7 years ago

Juventus, Italy 0 5196

He clearly moved his foot and legs thanks to VAR showing great angles but VAR says no goal? WTF!!!!! REF DID YOU WATCH THE VAR FOOTAGE YOU BLIND BITCH!!! Unbelievable. Should be 2-1 for Everton he fucking clearly moved his foot.

All comments

oleguer 7 years ago

Barcelona, Spain 0 195

That is why De Gea is not no.1 golie recent days. That’s a shame.

easyman 7 years ago

Chelsea, Poland 0 61

Guys guys chill. This is a close call soo...who you would think would get the benefit if its a hard decision? I bet the referees are instructed to favor Big teams with Big money when its close like that its really very simple. Till the day that money rules almost everything and defenitely competitive sports it is bound to happen most of the time...but yes I still think we should protest that and not just sit back and take it so you are right to be angry....so carrry on...just sayin :)

tommyprayogo 7 years ago

Liverpool, England 0 42

LOL what could MU do without VAR? Chelsea, Wolves, and now Everton was robbed

kibokiboo 7 years ago

Indonesia 0 12

Yeah, MU saved by VARguson again.

Leonardito 7 years ago

0 1108

The only way to get people talk about man united games. Controversy.

Valderrama 7 years ago

FC Porto, Colombia 0 2

how come VAR doesn't know Offside rules? Degea had no chance to save it after deflection and Sigurdson didn't obstruct Degea's view. Hence no offside!

Marcus2011 7 years ago

Chelsea FC, England 277 6501

Ah I am so happy! Why? Well now we have solid proof of how United was always getting favors when they were in trouble. Looks like they are back at it. Then they have the audacity to call it fair win, and better luck next time. These scums in EPL are fixing football in front of our eyes, and all fans can do is moan and complain then be dismissed as sore loosers.

Leonardito 7 years ago

0 1108

Youre happy, but this is sad. Cause its a solid proof that football will never be fair.

tiki_taka 7 years ago

Barcelona, France 368 9770

Offside 200 per cent.

taboih 7 years ago

Barcelona, Australia 0 594

The disallowed goal hurts me to my bone as a football fan.

Ironman3000 7 years ago

Manchester United, Spain 0 115

Which bone?

Leonardito 7 years ago

0 1108

Ironman. That bone that you dont have but you receive a lot.

bate_boko 7 years ago

0 39

Just the fact the ball was deflected by one of MU players is enough NOT to call it offside. Remember the first goal by South Korea vs Germany in the last world cup? A world cup English referees were banned from!

money_is_pizza 7 years ago

Barcelona, Spain 1 195

I wonder if you would still think it wasn't offside if the entire team was sitting in front of the goal. foot for thought

srk_rox 7 years ago

Liverpool 5 542

That's food for thought.
Probably foot(ball) being thoughtful, is actually foot for thought. Probably, football is a food for thought, that is nothing but foot for thought..
Mate, that is a word play. You're a genius.

ViscaBarcaCPA 7 years ago

Barcelona, Azerbaijan 0 68

srk_rox, what do you smoke, you philosopher?

srk_rox 7 years ago

Liverpool 5 542

@Visca I am a teetotaller.

craayzii 7 years ago

Chelsea 0 31

Even if that everton player was not there on the ground de gea still wouldn't have saved it. The people In control of the var have to also think about that. But their brains are made of timber so what can we do.

Ironman3000 7 years ago

Manchester United, Spain 0 115

ikr!!!! most of us can do is crying over it

Hamouda 7 years ago

Manchester United, Canada 0 127

The law is the law !!
Ignorants, before you open your filthy months READ ABOUT THE OFFSIDE RULE IT IS POSTED IN COMMENTS BY A WOLVES' FAN

xumeey 7 years ago

Liverpool 0 1462

We know the rules, moron, and he didn't break any of them so STFU.

This comment is disliked by many users (show)

serans 7 years ago

Manchester United, Poland 3 203

Imagine being GK in that last situation. Ball is coming to Sigurdsson path, you don't know if he is off or not (you don't need to know, it's not your job), therefore you have no idea what is he going to do (he might take that ball and shoot, or try to change the direction - doesnt matter if he is sitting or standing). He moves his legs in last moment, no time to react (in fairness there is no way De Gea would be able to save it, but it doesn't matter), the ball is in the net, but the flag went up, Sigudsson was in fact offside. I see nothing wrong here.

serans 7 years ago

Manchester United, Poland 3 203

I love how i get 5 downvotes but nobody can explain where I'm wrong.

Brobert 7 years ago

Liverpool, Madagascar 0 23

wow i have no words for this shit club.. i wonder how much money they payed the referee

Ironman3000 7 years ago

Manchester United, Spain 0 115

And i wonder how many words you can come up with?

akashnai90 7 years ago Edited

Real Madrid 0 398

I can see why the goal was disallowed, for a fraction of a second, he was in the line of sight of the keeper. Add to that the fact that he suddenly moved his leg, which can totally throw off the keeper (those who have actually played football would understand). Now, De Gea still would not have been able to save the shot if Sigurdsson wasn't there but it doesn't matter. To be brutally honest, Sigurdsson was dumb AF to be sitting there doing nothing. It's like he just started playing football and didn't know he could potentially interfere with the play sitting right in front of the goal in an offside position.

Showing previous versions of this text.

2020-03-01T18:58:02+00:00

I can see why the goal was disallowed, for a fraction of a second, he was in the line of sight of the keeper. To be brutally honest, Sigurdsson was dumb AF to be sitting there doing nothing. It's like he just started playing football and didn't know he could potentially interfere with the play sitting right in front of the goal in an offside position.

xumeey 7 years ago

Liverpool 0 1462

I was screaming get off the floor you moron I was worried he was going to block the shot lol

xumeey 7 years ago

Liverpool 0 1462

1. Sigurdsson does not obstruct DDG's vision meaning he's not interfering with play.
2. Sigurdsson moves his legs out of the way so he's not interfering with the play.

Another farcical VAR moment. English refs are making me hate football.

Ironman3000 7 years ago

Manchester United, Spain 0 115

Are you going to stop watching all English football? I hope all these hatred aren't blurring anyone vision

xumeey 7 years ago

Liverpool 0 1462

You can't deny how terrible English refs are. There's a reason FIFA didn't let them officiate in the world cup and FIFA will probably do the same thing in the next WC if they don't improve.

donald18 7 years ago

Manchester United 0 17

Please read the rules better. Sigurdson is interfering with with the play by moving his legs. That is interfering with the play the same as a dummy pass is.

xumeey 7 years ago

Liverpool 0 1462

And you should listen to officials of why they disallowed the goal, hint, it wasn't because he moved his legs.

BTW getting out of the way of a shot on target is not the same as a dummy pass. Now, who doesn't understand the simple facts about football?

Matchalatte 7 years ago

Wolverhampton Wanderers, Indonesia 0 15

Did the referee was doing the right decision? The answer is YES! Why? Sigurdson have a little move (active play) and gain an advantage to create a goal. If hes leg doesnt move, maybe it will onside.

VIKALP 7 years ago

Manchester United, England 0 396

People with agenda(United haters) Wont get this.

xumeey 7 years ago

Liverpool 0 1462

Are you mad? He moved his legs out of the way so he wouldn't interfere with the play if he didn't move his legs the ball would have hit him. Having said that he's a moron for just sitting there for a couple of seconds doing nothing.

HellBent 7 years ago

Everton 0 3

Holy hell. There were numerous times when players are offside but they let the ball go through their legs without hitting them, and it's considered a goal. This was no different.

Footy_watch 7 years ago

Arsenal, Brazil 30 1978

There was no advantage gained, de gea went the wrong way becayse of the deflection, not because of sigurdson

Ironman3000 7 years ago

Manchester United, Spain 0 115

@Hellbent yes there is. In this case the player staying in one spot in active play while in offside position in front of of goal, while other time players usually moving in and out of offside line.

Elbert134 7 years ago

Manchester United, Indonesia 0 88

VAR saved us again, even i was surprised. Should've count as a deflected goal in my opinion but i don't even know what counts as interfering with the play and what's not.... but well we'll take the point......

zoltan 7 years ago

0 48

if the ball does not hit maguire and hit sigurdson easy decision offside..the ball hit maguire and does not touch sigurdsson and other keeper could have saved it easily ..come one VAR..u could do better than this

Everton

FT

1 : 1

vs

HT 1 : 1

Manchester United

Everton

Starting XI

Substitutes

Coach

Manchester United

Starting XI

Substitutes

Coach

Everton FT 1 : 1 vs HT 1 : 1 Manchester United

Everton

Starting XI

Substitutes

Coach

Manchester United

Starting XI

Substitutes

Coach

More from Premier League

Everton

FT

1 : 1

vs

HT 1 : 1

Manchester United