@ramaboy Also Pedro was offside vs Madrid!
{{ searchResult.errors[0] }}
@ramaboy Also Pedro was offside vs Madrid!
pedro goal wasnt offsides actually, his feet were equal, also the angle in the video is bad but still shows that it was good there shadows are proof too
I agree with MessiDona.
Wtf
Chelsea fans just come and dislike everything, even they know it's true.
NOW COME AT ME CHELSEA FANS
Referees helped Chelsea?
I Cant believe it!!
Chelsea fans made me believe that Refs are always against them.
@quikzyyy dislike everything? wtf you talking about? even i admit that that goal was offside.
@nico10 you mean Arbeloas penalty!
Lol funny how Ramos pulls up Sanchez and then he got mad.
Yes, it was very clearly offside.
I know it would be best not to get involved but I actually thought the Supercopa was refereed very well. For me, that would've been a harsh penalty if given and I agree that Pedro was offside. I'd also like to mention that this match once more reminded me of just how much I despise Sergio Busquets. He is a fucking dsigrace and if he and Pepe never played in another clasico it would be for he best. BTW, I deeply respect Barca... not hating just calling it how I saw it. In fairness, Messi was fouled quite a few times and they weren't being given.
Footaholic, Did you even watched the match yesterday? Busquets did a clear match without dives and Pepe didn't even played because of an injury. Also the Pedro goal is to hard do see if it is a offside or onside... if u look from the left angle it's an offside if you look at it from the right angle it's a clear onside.
Nico, Busquets dived twice, as did Alexis twice trying to win 2 penalties which the ref got spot on, only thing he didn't do right was not booking him. Secondly it was offside, it's not just your feet that count in football anymore for offsides, it's any part of your body and he was marginly ahead.
@Footaholic Busqeuts yesterday was the best player after Andres Iniesta of course..But you are right he dived 1-2 times like an idiot!
@jimskeleton Its to hard to say about offside..
We have so many pictures and videos and still cannot decide..
So imagine the ref,How difficult it is within 2 seconds he was forced to make a decision..
@Don, I agree, the officials, especially the linesman have a tough job and a decision that is that close is very hard to get right 100% of the time, but after multiple replays I would say his arm and his head were slightly ahead of that of the defender.
Jimskeleton, when a player is diving a lot and you are used to see him diving you think he's always diving even if he's not. I watched the whole match and the repetitions and I didn't see any clear dive or a big exaggeration of a fault.
Also you can't disagree that R.Madrid was outplayed by Barcelona and they got a lot of luck because of Valdes misstake.
@Jimskeleton
If the attackers arm is ahead there is no problem..
offside rule is only about: Head,Foot,Body..
Not hand-arm!
@Don, depends who is officiating :P The official law is you're offside with any part of the body you can score with, but sometimes it seems if any part of the body is ahead you get the offsides these days. Was much better in the older days were the attacker was always given the advantage.
@Nico, First half both teams were poor, game was boring, Barca were the better team in the 2nd half but Valdes is a muppet, definite weak link in that Barca side.
Its here
should have been 3-2 but i didnt expect the keeper to see that anyway.