Bayern was the better side at CHL Final for 120'!Chelsea scored the goal with one of their few chances in the game and the match went on extra time.No score there despite Bayern could have done it and chelsea won it on the penalties.
Users ratings?
Here they are

Yesterday.Chelsea may have defended the biggest part of the match but this time they created more chances.In fact not just chances,but almost every of them could have been goal!
On the other side,again bayern dominated the game on terms of possession they made against more chances to score but not so dangerous as chelsea's.
At extra time Chelsea scored an early goal and after that they just defended to the end,hoping that Bayern wont score plus that they were with 10 players.
AT ET bayern had huge chances to score,Cech once again showed everyone his CLASS and saved everything went on target.
Bayern scored a goal in the last minute and won in on the penalties.Like chelsea on 2012 with the difference that they have played too good before the penalties,unlike chelsea who had a "pathetic" role in the game on 2012.
Ratings? :
Why bayern was poor at the first game and Chelsea top class at 2012?
And why yesterday Bayern was lucky and chelsea again top class?

I am just wondering.I am not hating or something like that.
But those ratings are too weird every fu$%ing time.

PS.I think @Lodatz and a few others understood what i was implying for Bayern and why will they finish behind City.
You all watched their problems at scoring,their problems at going through Chelsea's "solid" defence.
They will need some time to solve those problems :)

It's pretty simple really. Chelsea just has a bigger fan-base and Munich has a bigger hating fan-base.

i think that footyroom should make those chart them self instead of letting people vote, they should pick out users that are not biased and let them do it, it would be better for everyone and no one on Multi account vote also

WHUT WHUT whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat lodatz?
although I missed like 20 mins from different parts of the game, I know that tottenham never had a clean shot at our goal other than from a distance or deflection

@Zak: Not true, though certainly most of the chances were from distance, yes. That's because you parked the bus. ;) It was a good defensive performance.

I'm just saying: it's obvious how many Gooners simply clicked Top Class for Arsenal, and Poor for Tottenham, even though Tottenham actually had more shots, more crosses and had 57% possession, and since there are about ten times as many Arsenal fans as Spurs fans...

... yeah. ;)