Bayern was the better side at CHL Final for 120'!Chelsea scored the goal with one of their few chances in the game and the match went on extra time.No score there despite Bayern could have done it and chelsea won it on the penalties.
Users ratings?
Here they are

Yesterday.Chelsea may have defended the biggest part of the match but this time they created more chances.In fact not just chances,but almost every of them could have been goal!
On the other side,again bayern dominated the game on terms of possession they made against more chances to score but not so dangerous as chelsea's.
At extra time Chelsea scored an early goal and after that they just defended to the end,hoping that Bayern wont score plus that they were with 10 players.
AT ET bayern had huge chances to score,Cech once again showed everyone his CLASS and saved everything went on target.
Bayern scored a goal in the last minute and won in on the penalties.Like chelsea on 2012 with the difference that they have played too good before the penalties,unlike chelsea who had a "pathetic" role in the game on 2012.
Ratings? :
Why bayern was poor at the first game and Chelsea top class at 2012?
And why yesterday Bayern was lucky and chelsea again top class?

I am just wondering.I am not hating or something like that.
But those ratings are too weird every fu$%ing time.

PS.I think @Lodatz and a few others understood what i was implying for Bayern and why will they finish behind City.
You all watched their problems at scoring,their problems at going through Chelsea's "solid" defence.
They will need some time to solve those problems :)

what do you expect... Chelsea fans are higher in number... of course they wanna change reality to suit their team...

The answer to that would the the number of fans in this site: Chelsea fans dominate Bayern Munich by over 2000, so obviously there will be hate when things don\'t go in their favors.

As sick as it sounds, football fans will always be biased, and that is a fact in this site. A lot of members are still immature, only a few are mature enough to give fair ratings.

Yes but those games have been seen by all fans.
Juve,Barca,UTD,Real.. they dont have a reason to be biased..
Anyway you may be right.

"pathetic" in the game on 2012? We fought our freaking hearts out in that game.

"Pathetic" i mean that Chelsea left bayern to have the ball and attack hoping to steal the ball and counter attack.
They didnt try to get the possession or something like that.
They were waiting for Bayern mistake.Or to say it in a more correct way,they tried forcing bayern make mistakes!

Is that illegal in football?

Did i say that it is illegal?

You called it pathetic and then made an excuse by saying we were pathetic because of our use of counter attacks. Leading to my question of, was it illegal to only defend and counter attack the whole game? Because clearly, that's your definition of pathetic in football.

Using the word pathetic on our performance in CL final match was just a horrible decision.

@Ven

I'm sure Don didn't mean any offense. He was just trying to point out the bias on the match ratings.

And as for seeing that Bayern is rated as "lucky" by 30% of voters for the UEFA Super Cup is woeful. Bayern were by no means "lucky". They had to work their asses off to win, and that's what they did. In fact, they were unlucky to miss so many chances. But I guess that's what happens when a player of the quality of Gomez leaves, and because Guardiola doesn't use Mandzukic as a target man.

i agree with Don Andres for Bayern being "the better side". But how he called Chelsea pathetic, is wrong. You said that chelsea were pathetic because they left bayern have the ball and that the were waiting for them to make a mistake. Alright, let's say they did... well it's no problem cause that's just pure strategy.

Oh my bad.
Sorry @Ven.
Just seen the meaning of pathetic.
how stupid i were.
In greek a word pronounced like pathetic(Παθητικός in fact search it if you dont believe me) means as i see on the translator passive.
I thought that pathetic is the meaning of passive.
You are right then.
Just learned that i was using one word wrongly for so many years.
Pathetic=woeful in a few words,right?
Damn!

@Dynast: I agree, Bayern were the better team in the match. There's nothing more to it. I was quite surprised that we nearly won actually. But after a couple of hours of sadness, I realized how bright our team's future is. We used 4 players under the age of 23 and three players under the age of 27. For some of these young players, this was their first final. And they performed amazingly. The only sign of experience was in our defense, and that's why we held the score for so long. Bayern were indeed the better team, but I see nothing but positives from this match. The future is bright over at Chelsea :)

@Don: Oh, I see. Well then no harm done. I'm sorry about being riled up there, but nobody likes to see his team being insulted :P. Cheers.

Yes,though i didnt want to insult chelsea.
The main purpose of that thread was as Dynastian said the bias on the ratings.

I usually dont take account of these rating because its true that some teams have higher fans rate than others..i rather watch the match or highlights or read match reports to have a true idea of the rating of matches.

Well I don't even vote... if there were 3000 Real Madrid fans and 1500 Barcelona fans, and we beat them 1-3, the Real Madrid fans would probably vote Barcelona as poor. (Not hating on RM fans)

@Rama

Don't worry, it's not hate. It's a reality. Most fans are immature and impulsive, and if the case was like how you described it, you can bet that at least 10% of Barcelona votes would be "poor".

the only reason Chelsea survived was because of Cech and obviously the defence (Pep's Weakness..), the saves Cech made were just amazing

Fans of the opposite team are going to do that, but its not most of the people, like Dynastian said, its just the immature Fans.

Calm down guys , Bayern won the game and it silenced All the Chelsea fans ;) let them hate.. its normal.

@Iraqi_Madridsta: Silenced us? Haha! It took them the last 5 seconds of added time to finally equalize; against a team of children and with 10 men. They didn't silence us. They didn't even get revenge. That was the Super Cup, not the Champions League.

Funnily enough, you can see the same phenomenon in the Arsenal vs Tottenham highlights. ;)

Top Class vs Poor, in a 1-0 game where the losers dominated possession and shots? Do us a favour, will yer? ;)