Forum
{{ post.commentCount }}

Didn't find anything.

{{ searchResult.errors[0] }}



Players comparison poll
tiki_taka 10 years ago
Barcelona, France 368 9770

Which player do you prefer ? No argument needed at first place; maybe after since We will have to develop but not before...

Isco vs Hazard :


0
Comments
liomessi10 10 years ago
Barcelona, Argentina 222 3053

Isco. He would replace xavi well

0
netsten 10 years ago
Chelsea, Belgium 44 992

Tough one, I don't wanna be biased, alors je vote blanc.

0
AlexBatak 10 years ago
Chelsea, Italy 204 2707

Isco by MILES.

4
tuan_jinn 10 years ago
Manchester United, Netherlands 198 6912

Tough one... Can't choose...

If I must, I like Isco style a bit more. Isco then

0
Dynastian98 10 years ago Edited
Real Madrid 483 7140

I prefer Isco, but I think Hazard is the better player. There's not that much difference in quality between them though. Isco would be a superstar if he played for a club which would focus him like Chelsea do with Hazard.

0
  • History
Showing previous versions of this text.

I prefer Isco, but there shouldn't be too many doubts over Hazard being the better player.

I prefer Isco, but I think Hazard is the better player.

Marcus2011 10 years ago
Chelsea FC, England 277 6501

Isco

0
SunFlash 10 years ago
USA 19 3260

I have always felt that Hazard should give more output for the system that he's in, but I don't feel that Isco does more for RM than Hazard does for Chelsea, so I guess I prefer Hazard.

0
tiki_taka 10 years ago
Barcelona, France 368 9770

draw for me, i like both.

0
shpalman 10 years ago
AC Milan, Italy 55 2252

^ can't do that :P

Isco for me.

0
Jimbet 10 years ago
Arsenal, Malaysia 12 1292

i like isco. but hazard is better. so i'll go with hazard.

0
ashwin1729 10 years ago
Manchester United, England 10 707

Just curious: Does Isco play on the wings? I thought he was more of a CAM than a winger...don't follow Real that much, so my friends from Real can enlighten me.

0
Tuanis 10 years ago
Manchester United, England 87 2312

Weird poll, they dont even play in the same position. And the preference is in terms of what?

I really like both, But Hazard has that something special. Maybe when Isco starts getting more first team action...

0
ashwin1729 10 years ago
Manchester United, England 10 707

^Why are we comparing people who don't play in the same position? -_-

0
Dynastian98 10 years ago
Real Madrid 483 7140

@Ashwin

Isco is best utilized centrally as an AM. However, he has become much better defensively under Ancelotti, and has improved his work rate enough to be utilized very effectively as a box-to-box CM.

0
Eden17Hazard17 10 years ago
Chelsea FC 157 4232

What type of comparison is this? Isco is a billion times better than Hazard

0
JuanMata10 10 years ago
Chelsea, Austria 17 1696

Hazard is the better player, but I prefer Isco's style. He is probably my favourite player at the moment, I even have a kit from his Malaga days at home.

0
CroatiaFan123 10 years ago
Arsenal, Croatia 66 2775

Like almost everyvone said, Hazard is overally better player. But IMO Isco is monster, he is new Xavi, his passing is incredible...

0
decentK 10 years ago
Arsenal 38 2896

I prefer Isco, but I pretty much agree, Hazard is maybe slightly better player.

0
KTBFFHSWE 10 years ago
Chelsea FC, Sweden 52 2449

How come all Chelsea fans prefer Isco over Hazard? Hazard has better stats and is valued higher?

Per-90 Isco on the left, Hazard right!
Pass completion: 88% 87%
Key Passes: 1,69 2,43
Chances created: 2,04 2,67
Assists: 0,35 0,24
Goals: 0,15 0,37
Shots: 1,69 2,08
Succesfull takeons: 56.95% 64,29%
Interceptions: 0,96 0,61
Tackles won: 1,62 0,67
Fould suffered: 2,19 3,02

Isco is better defensively than Hazard, but I prefer Hazard over Isco in attack. Perhaps Iscos capabilities would be better used in a team like Chelsea, though? I can imagine Ronaldo and co make him shine a bit less! I would change him for Oscar anyday however because Isco is absolutely brilliant.. Isco and Hazard next to eachother..

2
KTBFFHSWE 10 years ago
Chelsea FC, Sweden 52 2449

Oh, sorry. Guess I developed the argument there.. Hazard for me..

0