Isco. He would replace xavi well
{{ searchResult.errors[0] }}
Isco. He would replace xavi well
Tough one, I don't wanna be biased, alors je vote blanc.
Isco by MILES.
Tough one... Can't choose...
If I must, I like Isco style a bit more. Isco then
I prefer Isco, but I think Hazard is the better player. There's not that much difference in quality between them though. Isco would be a superstar if he played for a club which would focus him like Chelsea do with Hazard.
I prefer Isco, but there shouldn't be too many doubts over Hazard being the better player.
I prefer Isco, but I think Hazard is the better player.
Isco
I have always felt that Hazard should give more output for the system that he's in, but I don't feel that Isco does more for RM than Hazard does for Chelsea, so I guess I prefer Hazard.
draw for me, i like both.
^ can't do that :P
Isco for me.
i like isco. but hazard is better. so i'll go with hazard.
Just curious: Does Isco play on the wings? I thought he was more of a CAM than a winger...don't follow Real that much, so my friends from Real can enlighten me.
Weird poll, they dont even play in the same position. And the preference is in terms of what?
I really like both, But Hazard has that something special. Maybe when Isco starts getting more first team action...
^Why are we comparing people who don't play in the same position? -_-
@Ashwin
Isco is best utilized centrally as an AM. However, he has become much better defensively under Ancelotti, and has improved his work rate enough to be utilized very effectively as a box-to-box CM.
What type of comparison is this? Isco is a billion times better than Hazard
Hazard is the better player, but I prefer Isco's style. He is probably my favourite player at the moment, I even have a kit from his Malaga days at home.
Like almost everyvone said, Hazard is overally better player. But IMO Isco is monster, he is new Xavi, his passing is incredible...
I prefer Isco, but I pretty much agree, Hazard is maybe slightly better player.
How come all Chelsea fans prefer Isco over Hazard? Hazard has better stats and is valued higher?
Per-90 Isco on the left, Hazard right!
Pass completion: 88% 87%
Key Passes: 1,69 2,43
Chances created: 2,04 2,67
Assists: 0,35 0,24
Goals: 0,15 0,37
Shots: 1,69 2,08
Succesfull takeons: 56.95% 64,29%
Interceptions: 0,96 0,61
Tackles won: 1,62 0,67
Fould suffered: 2,19 3,02
Isco is better defensively than Hazard, but I prefer Hazard over Isco in attack. Perhaps Iscos capabilities would be better used in a team like Chelsea, though? I can imagine Ronaldo and co make him shine a bit less! I would change him for Oscar anyday however because Isco is absolutely brilliant.. Isco and Hazard next to eachother..
Oh, sorry. Guess I developed the argument there.. Hazard for me..
Which player do you prefer ? No argument needed at first place; maybe after since We will have to develop but not before...
Isco vs Hazard :