Forum
{{ post.commentCount }}

Didn't find anything.

{{ searchResult.errors[0] }}



MANCHESTER CITY SET TO MAKE £40 MILLION BID FOR SUAREZ IN JANUARY
nandaYNWA 12 years ago
Liverpool, Australia 87 946

So apparenatally Mancini is interested in signing Suarez in January. To him I say fuc* off!!! U can't just buy players because u have money and then ruin there careers by making them bench warmers! Why don't u actually make some players from ur youth academy, instead of buying every teams good players, or actually buy a player for a decent price and make them into a star (because saying "make players from the youth academy" would be hipacritical of me as a Liverpool fan, but at least we've made some good players)!!!!!!

2
Comments
Trollman 12 years ago
Chelsea, Egypt 32 525

Haha, you mean Man City are following Chelsea, who were following Manchester United, who were following Leeds and Blackburn who were following Liverpool. And yes it is a big part of football and if you can't accept that look at the gif above again.

1
Heisinburg 12 years ago
Manchester United 67 1516

Well I can't criticise you for being what you are now, but what I can say is this: If "money is a big part of modern football" you say, then I guess that means that the club that spends the most amount of money, will have a greater chance of winning?
Personally I think that is what you're implying, so since Chelsea went spent heaps during the transfer season, and is continuing to do so in the midsummer transfers, like "Manchester United", we all expect many successes from you guys. Not just winning the BPL, but also winning the CL, or else you will give BPL a bad reputation of being overrated with lots of money, which we all despise to become. United do spend lots of money, yes, but at least United are wise at spending minimal amounts on players, and making great profits out of them. Barcelona is also a typical example of the perfect club, which Chelsea is still many years to become. 

1
Trollman 12 years ago
Chelsea, Egypt 32 525

Fair enough. I can see what you're saying, but to taking too much from a simple sentence. I said money is a big part of modern football. What you're stating is not near what I said. You believe because I said money is a big part of football that that means more money equals more trophies. No, I do not agree with that and I never said that. There is much more to winning trophies than money.

Btw, RVP overall will cost you guys 70 million in the 4 years of his contract so you're not really spending minimal are you now :P. Then again, I'm sure Hazard has a hefty wage on him too :P.

0
nandaYNWA 12 years ago
Liverpool, Australia 87 946

@Trollman
You can say it as much as u want. Money may be a big factor in modern day football, but it doesn't make it better each time u say it -.- Tbh, the old Liverpool spent huge amounts of money under dalglish. But under rogers, that is not us. Half a dozen players under 21 have broken into the first team, replacing the likes of carragher and Henderson. These include: wisdom, sterling, suso, Sinclair, Robinson, pacheco and Coates. Who have united or Chelsea got that actually play and score in serious premier league or champions league matches? The answer is no one. So don't get all defensive when u know that ur wrong. Because when Liverpool played Chelsea, who played? Sterling and suso. When Liverpool played Norwich, who played? Wisdom, suso, sterling and Robinson. I think I've made my point. But I don't fully agree with what u said before, that every current rich team followed in the footsteps if Liverpool, because we may have bought expensive players, but at least we won trophies, wish I could say the same for Chelsea though :') and at least  united are winning trophies now, regardless of their wealth. 

3
Trollman 12 years ago
Chelsea, Egypt 32 525

First off, bro I'm talking about the Liverpool of the 80s. Second off, Hazard, Marin, Moses, Azpi, De Bryune, Mata, Piazon, Bertrand, Romeu, and Oscar. All of them under 25. Make sure you know you are right before saying something like that.

0
Trollman 12 years ago
Chelsea, Egypt 32 525

Also...

Premier League Titles: 1954 - 55, 2004 - 05, 2005 - 06,2009-10

FA Cup: Winners : 1970, 1997, 2000, 2007, 2009, 2012

League Cup: 1965, 1998, 2005, 2007

Charity Cups: 1955, 2000, 2005, 2009

UEFA Super Cup: 1998

UEFA Cup Winners' Cup: 1971, 1990

Yes we have won trophies, nanda.

0
PuppetMaster 12 years ago
England 15 331

isn't united overspending too?

0
Trollman 12 years ago
Chelsea, Egypt 32 525

Oh pardon me, I forgot to mention 1 Champions League cup.

0
nandaYNWA 12 years ago
Liverpool, Australia 87 946

I was talking about since they were bought by Roman Abramovic and were made into a russian oil business.

0
nandaYNWA 12 years ago
Liverpool, Australia 87 946

And if u want me to name the Liverpool squad who is under 25, then just say so!

1
Trollman 12 years ago
Chelsea, Egypt 32 525

During the Roman era we have won 11 trophies overall. Before we have won 11 trophies overall. Once again you are incorrect. And no thanks... I don't want to know your players 25 and under. I was just proving you wrong that we do play young players in important games too.

0
nandaYNWA 12 years ago
Liverpool, Australia 87 946

I've lost track, what are we even arguing about, lol. But I think I may be wrong :O so sorry mate :)

0
devilz 12 years ago
Manchester United, England 47 670

@puppet, i don't how you have figured that one out, but everyone seems to forgot that we sold ronaldo for £80M and tevez for around £30M...

0
Dynastian98 12 years ago
Real Madrid 483 7140

@Trollman

NandaYNWA is right. Brendan Rogers has put out the best from his youth players. Chelsea have bought all those players after they made their mark in football (except Piazon).

0
tdot2barca 12 years ago
Assyriska FF, Brazil 35 956

I think Suarez should go to Juve!

0
MRarsenal500 12 years ago
Arsenal, England 59 741

yeah i know nandaYNWA. just like Nasri was a great player in Arsenal turned to bench warmer in Man city

0