I think both.
{{ searchResult.errors[0] }}
I think both.
Both as well, Sinclair said he wouldn't renew at Swansea, as it appears no other offers have been put in Swansea are doing the right thing to take the money but if Sinclair had any sense he would stay put instead of rotting on City's bench
Mancini doesn't know who to buy, unless it is a top class player o a great player another team spotted, Just like PSG. The day that Manchester City buys an under 23 player who nobody else knew and then becomes a star, that day would probably be the same day the world ends... As for Sinclair, he is already a top player for Swansea, not that good but everybody knows he is probably ruining his career by signing for a team who wont need him unless there is like a very desperate multiple-injuries situation.
Sinclair shouldn't. On his debut people will cheer lke crazy, but after that he's Nasris bench warmer.
looks like city are gunna waste more talent
Mancini has set his sights on Swansea City's Scott Sinclair. This deal is thought to be worth around €6.5M and most likely being finalized by Tuesday. What are your thoughts on this deal? Is Sinclair making a mistake? Or is City buying a player they don't need?