Forum
{{ post.commentCount }}

Didn't find anything.

{{ searchResult.errors[0] }}



Jack Wilshere > Marco Verratti
Comments
Eden17Hazard17 11 years ago Edited
Chelsea FC 157 4232

Wilshere can get way better.

0
  • History
Showing previous versions of this text.

Wilshere is way better.

Dynastian98 11 years ago
Real Madrid 483 7140

Verratti anyday. Wilshere is just hyped because he is English. Remember how hyped he was compared to Koke? Oh what happened here? Looks like Koke has become one of the best midfielders in the world now (or on his way there), and Wilshere is still stuck on "promising".

1
KingHenry 11 years ago Edited
Arsenal, France 44 1362

@dynastian I'm guessing you don't watch wilshere often. I hope england shows up at the world cup so people can see what he can do. He would start for us if not for the repeted injuries. And ramsey being a beast

0
  • History
Showing previous versions of this text.

@dynastian I'm guessing you don't watch wilshere often. I hope england shows up at the world cup so he can prove he's now more than just a promising midfielder. He would start for us if not for the repeted injuries and ramsey being a beast.

FredTilson 11 years ago
Manchester City, France 61 769

I do watch him often and he's not as good as Veratti or Koke at the moment. Doesn't mean he's not a good player. Just those two are better.

0
Tuanis 11 years ago
Manchester United, England 87 2311

Wilshere is by far the best player Arsenal's got... And one of the best young midfielders in the EPL. Verrati still needs to grow up on experience.

0
shpalman 11 years ago
AC Milan, Italy 55 2252

quote Dyn: "Verratti anyday. Wilshere is just hyped because he is English."

this^ is what i wanted to come out. for starters, they're 2 different players, as Wilshere is more offensive than Verratti, the latter is Pirlo without free-kick mastery. tho' Verratti is better than Pirlo at interdiction and at holding the ball. that said, now you want to explain me why on Transfermarkt Wilshere's value is 33mil €, while Verratti's 20mil €. this brings us again to the start point: "Wilshere is just hyped because he is English."

Wilshere has talent, no doubt about it, still i don't see him to have the same consistency as Verratti (take away the injury).

i also know, as a matter of fact, that after i made this post karma will punish me and Italy will be boned by the young english talent at the WC2014. it always happens like that...

0
Dynastian98 11 years ago Edited
Real Madrid 483 7140

@KingHenry

Well, that's kind of the point, isn't it? He's being outshone at his own club by Ozil and Ramsey, who are both fairly young in their own accord (neither have hit their prime yet). And yeah, I haven't watched much of Wilshere recently. I watched him more when I actually had an EPL channel, which was when he was still in his teens. But I think I've watched enough of him to compare him with Verratti and Koke.

0
  • History
Showing previous versions of this text.

@KingHenry

Well, that's kind of the point, isn't it? He's being outshone at his own club by Ozil and Ramsey, who are both fairly young in their own accord (neither have hit their prime yet). And yeah, I haven't watched much of Wilshere recently. I watched him more when I actually had an EPL channel, which was when he was still in his teens.

shpalman 11 years ago
AC Milan, Italy 55 2252

@Tuanis

what makes Wilshere more experienced than Verratti?

0
Tuanis 11 years ago
Manchester United, England 87 2311

Wilshere has been a regular starting XI player since very young at one of the best clubs in one of the most competitive leagues... Verrati spent a lot of time playing but for a Serie B team.

0
shpalman 11 years ago
AC Milan, Italy 55 2252

a serie B team which won the league under the guidance of Zeman. not sure Wilshere can have the same tactical experience as Verratti, or at least i don't feel to say he has more. still doesn't justify 13mil € difference in market value imo.

0
Dynastian98 11 years ago Edited
Real Madrid 483 7140

@Shpalman

To be honest, market value doesn't represent the true value of a player. Wilshere valued at 33 M is bullsh*t because Isco himself is valued at 35 M, and we know the real difference in skill and talent between Isco and Wilshere is pretty obvious. Due to inflation, the real prices of these players are hidden, but this is what I feel it should be.

Isco > Verratti > Wilshere

If Isco is 35, then Verratti should be around the 28-32 mark, and Wilshere around the 25 mark. Or however you feel to set the price precedence.

1
  • History
Showing previous versions of this text.

@Shpalman

To be honest, market value doesn't represent the true value of a player. Wilshere valued at 33 M is bullsh*t because Isco himself is valued at 35 M, and we know the real difference in skill and talent between Isco and Wilshere is pretty obvious. Due to inflation, the real prices of these players are hidden, but this is what I feel it should be.

Isco > Verratti > Wilshere

If Isco is 35, then Verratti should be around the 28-32 mark, and Wilshere around the 25 mark.

tiki_taka 11 years ago
Barcelona, France 367 9768

Verrati for me.

0
shpalman 11 years ago
AC Milan, Italy 55 2252

4:04, you do that in your own box at 21 years of age, fresh in a new foreign league coming from serie B.
you've got to have balls of steel.

@Dynastian: yep Isco and Verratti are almost on the same level, but here as well we could consider them the same level because both offer something that the other player doesn't. meaning Isco offensively, while Verratti defensively. Isco plays more in a virtuoso manner, Verratti still does that but he's already more pragmatic than the spanish guy. Verratti could play with both Isco or Wilshere tho', while the latter 2 would trouble eachother together on the pitch; so the correct comparison would be between Isco and Wilshere.
Isco is clearly 1 level above. Isco is even better than Messi if you ask me, for the way i see football at least.

0
Vendetta 11 years ago
Chelsea FC, Egypt 202 3025

Paul Pogba (once we sign him. pls sign him. pls.)

0
Zakzook 11 years ago
Arsenal, Syria 32 785

Based on form, Verrati.
Based on talent, they're equal. People forget the season Wilshere had before last year. He had been injury plagued and maybe will come back like Ramsey did.

0
mladen 11 years ago
Manchester United, Yugoslavia 253 2319

not same position. both good on their positions.

0
Wolfie 10 years ago
Inter, Germany 94 1844

Wilshere is not even in the same Galaxy as Verratti! Natural successor to Pirlo.

0
Lodatz 10 years ago Edited
Tottenham Hotspur, England 150 4992

"Isco is even better than Messi if you ask me, for the way i see football at least."

I'm gonna need some help seeing that one with you... ;)

But care to explain?

0
  • History
Showing previous versions of this text.

"Isco is even better than Messi if you ask me, for the way i see football at least."

I'm gonna need some help seeing that one with you... ;)

But care to explain?

tiki_taka 10 years ago
Barcelona, France 367 9768

His point, why does he need to justify it ?

0
Lodatz 10 years ago Edited
Tottenham Hotspur, England 150 4992

Because I'm asking his opinion, since I am intrigued by this statement.

Are you seriously going to derail THIS thread too?

0
  • History
Showing previous versions of this text.

Because I'm asking his opinion.

Are you seriously going to derail THIS thread too?