First of all, all those sources you got are completely unreliable. I mean, seriously, The Guardian? ESPN FC???
Did you not hear that La Liga officials haven't received any paperwork from your shady club, regarding David De Gea, throughout the entire transfer season, until the very last minute???
This indicates that Real Madrid are either gonna try and, once again, steal another top player from our club, or just wait for another entire season to get him for free.United didn't sabotage anything, all we wanted was to keep our best players, and you didn't do anything about it until the very last minute, and worst of all, you tried to compromise the deal by stealing De Gea, while keeping Navas, which was totally against what we both agreed upon. Bad move? Fk you.
This entire De Gea saga, including that four-eyed c**t Perez, clearly revealed Real Madrid's true colors.
Badly handled or not, we clearly want De Gea to be happy, but in the real world, one man's not bigger than the club, so business is business - and Real Madrid didn't pay the price we've asked for - so get fked.
Here's a true source, from the CLUB website itself, showing Real Madrid's hypocrisy.
Manchester United notes Real Madrid’s statement on the attempt to sign David De Gea and sell Navas to Manchester United. The club feels compelled to provide some clarification with the following facts.
-
Manchester United did not seek contact from Real Madrid for the sale of David. David is a key member of our squad and the club’s preference was not to sell.
-
No offer was received for David until yesterday.
-
At lunchtime yesterday, Real Madrid made its first offer to buy David. A deal was agreed between the clubs, which included Navas being transferred to Old Trafford. The deals were dependent on each other.
-
In the last several hours of the process, with Navas at the Real Madrid training ground, Real Madrid were controlling the documentation processes of David, Navas and Real Madrid. Manchester United was in control only of the documentation of Manchester United.
-
Manchester United sent transfer documents for both players to Real Madrid at 20:42 BST. David’s documentation was returned by Real Madrid to Manchester United without the signatory page at 22:32 BST.
-
At 22:40 BST, minutes before the deadline, major changes to the documentation came through to Manchester United which immediately put the deals at risk. - Only at 22:55 BST were the documents that are needed to cancel David’s contract received by Manchester United from Real Madrid.
-
At this point Navas’ documentation was still not returned by Real Madrid.
-
At 22:58 BST, the transfer agreement was sent back by Manchester United, uploaded onto TMS and accepted – all before the deadline.
- It is our understanding that the deals couldn’t happen because:
Real Madrid didn’t upload David’s documents onto TMS in time (Manchester United did)
Real Madrid didn’t upload David’s documents to the Spanish league in time, per reports it seems some 28 minutes after the deadline
- The fact that Manchester United filed the papers on time was acknowledged by the Football Association, who offered to support that claim in any discussions with FIFA. The club offered this assistance, as well as its own timestamped documents to Real Madrid but they have chosen not to go down this route.
Manchester United acts appropriately and efficiently in its transfer dealings. The club is delighted that its fan-favourite double Player of the Year, David de Gea, remains a Manchester United player.
First of all, all those sources you got are completely unreliable. I mean, seriously, The Guardian? ESPN FC???
Did you not hear that La Liga officials haven't received any paperwork from your shady club, regarding David De Gea, throughout the entire transfer season, until the very last minute???
This indicates that Real Madrid are either gonna try and, once again, steal another top player from our club, or just wait for another entire season to get him for free.
United didn't sabotage anything, all we wanted was to keep our best players, and you didn't do anything about it until the very last minute, and worst of all, you tried to compromise the deal by stealing De Gea, while keeping Navas, which was totally against what we both agreed upon. Bad move? Fk you. This entire De Gea saga, including that four-eyed c**t Perez, clearly revealed Real Madrid's true colors.
Badly handled or not, we clearly want De Gea to be happy, but in the real world, one man's not bigger than the club, so business is business - and Real Madrid didn't pay the price we've asked for - so get fked.
Here's a true source, from the CLUB website itself:
Manchester United notes Real Madrid’s statement on the attempt to sign David De Gea and sell Navas to Manchester United. The club feels compelled to provide some clarification with the following facts.
-
Manchester United did not seek contact from Real Madrid for the sale of David. David is a key member of our squad and the club’s preference was not to sell.
-
No offer was received for David until yesterday.
-
At lunchtime yesterday, Real Madrid made its first offer to buy David. A deal was agreed between the clubs, which included Navas being transferred to Old Trafford. The deals were dependent on each other.
-
In the last several hours of the process, with Navas at the Real Madrid training ground, Real Madrid were controlling the documentation processes of David, Navas and Real Madrid. Manchester United was in control only of the documentation of Manchester United.
-
Manchester United sent transfer documents for both players to Real Madrid at 20:42 BST. David’s documentation was returned by Real Madrid to Manchester United without the signatory page at 22:32 BST.
-
At 22:40 BST, minutes before the deadline, major changes to the documentation came through to Manchester United which immediately put the deals at risk.
-
Only at 22:55 BST were the documents that are needed to cancel David’s contract received by Manchester United from Real Madrid.
-
At this point Navas’ documentation was still not returned by Real Madrid.
-
At 22:58 BST, the transfer agreement was sent back by Manchester United, uploaded onto TMS and accepted – all before the deadline.
- It is our understanding that the deals couldn’t happen because:
Real Madrid didn’t upload David’s documents onto TMS in time (Manchester United did)
Real Madrid didn’t upload David’s documents to the Spanish league in time, per reports it seems some 28 minutes after the deadline
- The fact that Manchester United filed the papers on time was acknowledged by the Football Association, who offered to support that claim in any discussions with FIFA. The club offered this assistance, as well as its own timestamped documents to Real Madrid but they have chosen not to go down this route.
Manchester United acts appropriately and efficiently in its transfer dealings. The club is delighted that its fan-favourite double Player of the Year, David de Gea, remains a Manchester United player.
First of all, all those sources you got are completely unreliable. I mean, seriously, The Guardian? ESPN FC???
Did you not hear that La Liga officials haven't received any paperwork from your shady club, regarding David De Gea, throughout the entire transfer season, until the very last minute???
This indicates that Real Madrid are either gonna try and, once again, steal another top player from our club, or just wait for another entire season to get him for free.United didn't sabotage anything, all we wanted was to keep our best players, and you didn't do anything about it until the very last minute, and worst of all, you tried to compromise the deal by stealing De Gea, while keeping Navas, which was totally against what we both agreed upon. Bad move? Fk you.
This entire De Gea saga, including that four-eyed c**t Perez, clearly revealed Real Madrid's true colors.
Badly handled or not, we clearly want De Gea to be happy, but in the real world, one man's not bigger than the club, so business is business - and Real Madrid didn't pay the price we've asked for - so get fked.
Here's a true source, from the CLUB website itself, showing Real Madrid's hypocrisy.
Manchester United notes Real Madrid’s statement on the attempt to sign David De Gea and sell Navas to Manchester United. The club feels compelled to provide some clarification with the following facts.
-
Manchester United did not seek contact from Real Madrid for the sale of David. David is a key member of our squad and the club’s preference was not to sell.
-
No offer was received for David until yesterday.
-
At lunchtime yesterday, Real Madrid made its first offer to buy David. A deal was agreed between the clubs, which included Navas being transferred to Old Trafford. The deals were dependent on each other.
-
In the last several hours of the process, with Navas at the Real Madrid training ground, Real Madrid were controlling the documentation processes of David, Navas and Real Madrid. Manchester United was in control only of the documentation of Manchester United.
-
Manchester United sent transfer documents for both players to Real Madrid at 20:42 BST. David’s documentation was returned by Real Madrid to Manchester United without the signatory page at 22:32 BST.
-
At 22:40 BST, minutes before the deadline, major changes to the documentation came through to Manchester United which immediately put the deals at risk. - Only at 22:55 BST were the documents that are needed to cancel David’s contract received by Manchester United from Real Madrid.
-
At this point Navas’ documentation was still not returned by Real Madrid.
-
At 22:58 BST, the transfer agreement was sent back by Manchester United, uploaded onto TMS and accepted – all before the deadline.
- It is our understanding that the deals couldn’t happen because:
Real Madrid didn’t upload David’s documents onto TMS in time (Manchester United did)
Real Madrid didn’t upload David’s documents to the Spanish league in time, per reports it seems some 28 minutes after the deadline
- The fact that Manchester United filed the papers on time was acknowledged by the Football Association, who offered to support that claim in any discussions with FIFA. The club offered this assistance, as well as its own timestamped documents to Real Madrid but they have chosen not to go down this route.
Manchester United acts appropriately and efficiently in its transfer dealings. The club is delighted that its fan-favourite double Player of the Year, David de Gea, remains a Manchester United player.
Source: http://www.manutd.com/en/News-And-Features/Football-News/2015/Sep/manchester-united-statement-in-response-to-real-madrid-comments-on-david-de-gea-transfer.aspx
"If claims of Louis van Gaal being delighted with the way the transfer window went are correct, it is hard to believe hanging on to his No1 was not the plan" - The Guardian
Read full: http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2015/sep/05/david-de-gea-manchester-united-accident-transfer-window
"Was David De Gea's Real Madrid move intentionally blocked by Man United?" - ESPN FC.
Read Full: http://www.espnfc.us/blog/transfer-talk/79/post/2598412/did-man-united-sabotage-david-de-gea-move
It certainly seems that way. First they sabotage the transfer, then Van Gaal decides to bench him unless he signs a new contract. Knowing De Gea's ambition to play in the upcoming Euro's, it seems like Manchester United is blackmailing him. Especially following comments by Vicende del Bosque that it would be hard to play Da Gea if he does not get regular playing time. Even though he had no problem playing Casillas while he was benched at Real.. but that is another issue altogether.
Some know that I am a supporter of Real, but I'm really not at all being biased about this. At this point, I could not care less about Da Gea, or his impending arrival. I think we have a very good shot-stopper in Keylor Navas, who is only going to get better as he gets more playing time and builds his confidence. His performance against Betis was truly top class.
Is this the right way to treat a player though? I am trying not to sound hypocritical, as I am aware that Real Madrid has mistreated players in the past but not this way. The problem Real Madrid was that we didn't field players who wanted to play for us or we forced out players who wanted to stay. We've never forced anyone to play or stay with us, or to sign a contract who did not want to - which is precisely what United seems to be doing to Da Gea. To treat a player, who had been their standout performer for two seasons in a row, like this is just very wrong.
I've read opinions and comments from many United supporters saying how they love him, and how they only want the best for him.. if that's the case though, why not grant him his wish?
This is not love, nor is it support. It's simply overwhelming need for his talent, even to the point of forcing and blackmailing him to stay. Threatening to severely hurt his career.
Bad, bad move United. How far you've fallen..
"If claims of Louis van Gaal being delighted with the way the transfer window went are correct, it is hard to believe hanging on to his No1 was not the plan" - The Guardian
Read full: http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2015/sep/05/david-de-gea-manchester-united-accident-transfer-window
"Was David De Gea's Real Madrid move intentionally blocked by Man United?" - ESPN FC.
Read Full: http://www.espnfc.us/blog/transfer-talk/79/post/2598412/did-man-united-sabotage-david-de-gea-move
It certainly seem that way. First they sabotage the transfer, then Van Gaal decides to bench him unless he signs a new contract. Knowing De Gea's ambition to play in the upcoming Euro's, it seems like Manchester United is blackmailing him. Especially following comments by Vicende del Bosque that it would be hard to play Da Gea if he does not get regular playing time. Even though he had no problem playing Casillas while he was benched at Real.. but that is another issue altogether.
Some know that I am a supporter of Real, but I'm really not at all being biased about this. At this point, I could not care less about Da Gea, or his impending arrival. I think we have a very good shot-stopper in Keylor Navas, who is only going to get better as he gets more playing time and builds his confidence. His performance against Betis was truly top class.
Is this the right way to treat a player though? I am trying not to sound hypocritical, as I am aware that Real Madrid has mistreated player in the past but not this way. The problem Real Madrid was that we didn't field players who wanted to play for us. We've never forced anyone to play or stay with us, or to sign a contract - which is precisely what United seems to be doing to Da Gea. To treat a player, who had been their standout performer for two seasons in a row, like this is just very wrong.
I've read opinions and comments from many United supporters saying how they love him, and how they only want the best for him.. if that's the case though, why not grant him his wish?
This is not love, nor is it support. It's simply overwhelming need for his talent, even to the point of forcing and blackmailing him to stay. Threatening to severely hurt his career.
Bad, bad move United.
"If claims of Louis van Gaal being delighted with the way the transfer window went are correct, it is hard to believe hanging on to his No1 was not the plan" - The Guardian
Read full: http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2015/sep/05/david-de-gea-manchester-united-accident-transfer-window
"Was David De Gea's Real Madrid move intentionally blocked by Man United?" - ESPN FC.
Read Full: http://www.espnfc.us/blog/transfer-talk/79/post/2598412/did-man-united-sabotage-david-de-gea-move
It certainly seems that way. First they sabotage the transfer, then Van Gaal decides to bench him unless he signs a new contract. Knowing De Gea's ambition to play in the upcoming Euro's, it seems like Manchester United is blackmailing him. Especially following comments by Vicende del Bosque that it would be hard to play Da Gea if he does not get regular playing time. Even though he had no problem playing Casillas while he was benched at Real.. but that is another issue altogether.
Some know that I am a supporter of Real, but I'm really not at all being biased about this. At this point, I could not care less about Da Gea, or his impending arrival. I think we have a very good shot-stopper in Keylor Navas, who is only going to get better as he gets more playing time and builds his confidence. His performance against Betis was truly top class.
Is this the right way to treat a player though? I am trying not to sound hypocritical, as I am aware that Real Madrid has mistreated player in the past but not this way. The problem Real Madrid was that we didn't field players who wanted to play for us. We've never forced anyone to play or stay with us, or to sign a contract - which is precisely what United seems to be doing to Da Gea. To treat a player, who had been their standout performer for two seasons in a row, like this is just very wrong.
I've read opinions and comments from many United supporters saying how they love him, and how they only want the best for him.. if that's the case though, why not grant him his wish?
This is not love, nor is it support. It's simply overwhelming need for his talent, even to the point of forcing and blackmailing him to stay. Threatening to severely hurt his career.
Bad, bad move United.
"If claims of Louis van Gaal being delighted with the way the transfer window went are correct, it is hard to believe hanging on to his No1 was not the plan" - The Guardian
Read full: http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2015/sep/05/david-de-gea-manchester-united-accident-transfer-window
"Was David De Gea's Real Madrid move intentionally blocked by Man United?" - ESPN FC.
Read Full: http://www.espnfc.us/blog/transfer-talk/79/post/2598412/did-man-united-sabotage-david-de-gea-move
It certainly seems that way. First they sabotage the transfer, then Van Gaal decides to bench him unless he signs a new contract. Knowing De Gea's ambition to play in the upcoming Euro's, it seems like Manchester United is blackmailing him. Especially following comments by Vicende del Bosque that it would be hard to play Da Gea if he does not get regular playing time. Even though he had no problem playing Casillas while he was benched at Real.. but that is another issue altogether.
Some know that I am a supporter of Real, but I'm really not at all being biased about this. At this point, I could not care less about Da Gea, or his impending arrival. I think we have a very good shot-stopper in Keylor Navas, who is only going to get better as he gets more playing time and builds his confidence. His performance against Betis was truly top class.
Is this the right way to treat a player though? I am trying not to sound hypocritical, as I am aware that Real Madrid has mistreated players in the past but not this way. The problem Real Madrid was that we didn't field players who wanted to play for us or we forced out players who wanted to stay. We've never forced anyone to play or stay with us, or to sign a contract who did not want to - which is precisely what United seems to be doing to Da Gea. To treat a player, who had been their standout performer for two seasons in a row, like this is just very wrong.
I've read opinions and comments from many United supporters saying how they love him, and how they only want the best for him.. if that's the case though, why not grant him his wish?
This is not love, nor is it support. It's simply overwhelming need for his talent, even to the point of forcing and blackmailing him to stay. Threatening to severely hurt his career.
Bad, bad move United.