It's not Wenger who I'm mad at. Yes he's stubborn. But I, personally, want answers from the boardroom. They always cover up and deviate from our enquiries. I want answers from Gazidis and especially "Silent" Stan Kroenke. I don't know what these two guys are about. Whether they want what's best for the club or their own interests. Wenger is simply a manager but you have to remember he's an economic genius (He has a degree or something) and maybe Wenger has his own agenda to do what's best for Arsenal in terms of financial stability. In ten years or so in the future, the truth will out. And I hope everyone who chastised Wenger regret what they said (especially Piers Morgan). But this is just a hope. I can never hate Wenger for what's he's done for us. It's hating Henry for getting old and not scoring :/ This is just my opinion.
Since the loss at Bradford a lot of people and media are speculating that Wenger may resign at some point. The media in particularly have successfully managed to rile up the public (and Arsenal supporters). For me there are two ways to look at Arsene Wenger: An economic point of view and a football point of view.
Moving to a new stadium is not cheap. However, Wenger has continuously shown a positive and shrewd method of handling payments and debts. Ever since his reign, Arsenal has been elevated to even higher standards than it was before.
On the other hand, Wenger is portrayed as a stubborn man on the field. His tactics and management skills has come under scrutiny in recent times. From questionable substitutions to players being out-of-position (Ramsey on the wing??), many have called for Wenger's head.
So should Wenger stay or should he go? If he does: who will the replacement be? Let's have a healthy debate.