Substitutions

In on 90' for

Marcus Rashford

Harry Maguire

In on 90' for

Tyrell Malacia

Lisandro Martinez

In on 90' for

Casemiro

Scott McTominay

In on 46' for

Anthony Martial

Antony

In on 72' for

Christian Eriksen

Alejandro Garnacho

Jiminy_Soccer 2 years ago

Manchester United, England 0 77

United

ElonMusk 2 years ago

Manchester United, USA 0 32

A win is a win.

FireBraguette 2 years ago

Manchester United, Mauritius 0 502

Not like we didn't deserve it

estcrow 2 years ago Edited

0 51

Rashford didn't touch/block a single city player nor did cover the view of their goalkeeper, that's why it was counted as a goal. You can't just disallow every goal where somebody else has been offside because the other players might think he could take the ball. Citys own fault they were sleeping in this situation on Bruno. Controversial decision but either way it would have caused a massive upset.

Showing previous versions of this text.

2 years ago

Rashford didn't touch/block a single city player nor did cover the view of their goalkeeper, that's why it was counted as a goal. You can't just disallow every goal where somebody else has been offside because the other players might think he could take the ball. Citys own fault they were sleeping in this situation on Bruno. Controversial desicion but either way it would have caused a massive upset.

skaterx 2 years ago

0 73

Man Utd got lucky that Haaland didn't play oh wait...

Jimbet 2 years ago Edited

Arsenal, Malaysia 12 1292

Bruno goal should not count. But City played like shit also. sideway passing. De Bruyne is non-existence.

Showing previous versions of this text.

2 years ago

Bruno goal should not count.

Sabiol 2 years ago

Argentina 0 646

Massive offside from Rashford in the 1st goal. What a hell the ref did there?

Sesshoumaru 2 years ago

Real Madrid, Israel 0 64

Rashford did not touch the ball but was involved during the first goal should have been disallowed

Substitutions

Bench

Missing Players