Matches

Nope, nothing found.

Forum

Didn't find anything.



Wolverhampton Wanderers
FT
2 : 3
vs
HT 1 : 3
West Ham United


  • Wolverhampton Wanderers
  • Goals
  • Dendoncker (44')
  • Silva (68')
  • Cards
  • Neves (85')
  • West Ham United
  • Goals
  • Lingard (6')
  • Fornals (14')
  • Bowen (38')
  • Cards
  • Dawson (4')
  • Diop (10')
  • Soucek (90')
  • Lingard (90')
Full lineups: Wolverhampton Wanderers vs West Ham United

Wolverhampton Wanderers

Starting XI

  • 11. Rui Patricio
  • 22. Nelson Semedo
  • 16. Conor Coady
  • 27. Romain Saiss
  • 3. Rayan Ait Nouri
  • 32. Leander Dendoncker
  • 8. Ruben Neves
  • 7. Pedro Neto
  • 10. Daniel Podence
  • 37. Adama Traore
  • 12. Willian Jose

Substitutes

  • 21. John Ruddy
  • 2. Ki-Jana Hoever
  • 49. Max Kilman
  • 75. Christian Marques
  • 42. Lewis Richards
  • 18. Morgan Gibbs-White
  • 20. Vitinha
  • 54. Owen Otasowie
  • 17. Fabio Silva

Coach

  • Nuno Espirito Santo

West Ham United

Starting XI

  • 1. Lukasz Fabianski
  • 5. Vladimir Coufal
  • 15. Craig Dawson
  • 23. Issa Diop
  • 3. Aaron Cresswell
  • 18. Pablo Fornals
  • 16. Mark Noble
  • 28. Tomas Soucek
  • 26. Arthur Masuaku
  • 11. Jesse Lingard
  • 30. Michail Antonio

Substitutes

  • 25. David Martin
  • 34. Nathan Trott
  • 4. Fabian Balbuena
  • 14. Frederik Alves Ibsen
  • 24. Ryan Fredericks
  • 31. Ben Johnson
  • 9. Said Benrahma
  • 20. Jarrod Bowen
  • 45. Ademipo Odubeko

Coach

  • David Moyes
  • 9
    fouls
    9
  • 1
    offsides
    1
  • 5
    shots on target
    6
  • 12
    shots off target
    2
  • 3
    blocked shots
    0
  • 0
    counter attacks
    1
  • 4
    corners
    2
  • 31
    crosses
    16
  • 66%
    possession
    34%
18 Votes
Wolverhampton Wanderers vs West Ham United
Team Performance
3 Comments
BigCity 6 years ago
Manchester City, USA 0 200
How much do you think Lingard will cost city?
0
Gennady 6 years ago
Manchester United 285 3985
Damn Lingard is on fire
2
milanlamiavita 6 years ago Edited
Bustese Milano City, Italy 4 3418
I actually watched the entire 95 minutes. Wolves have a woeful record defensively when playing with a 4 man defence. In the first half, they were playing like it was a training game. Every time they were in west ham's box, they'd leave max 2-3 players. So easy for west ham to exploit. Second half, I didn't see lingard. A ghost. The second 45 minutes and 5 minutes of added time, the only time i saw him was when he was time wasting or when he got cramp.
With nearly 25 years of seeing hype around English players, it's easy to see that Lingard is not good enough for Man utd. Teams play differently vs a 'big' club that they'd do vs West ham. Completely differing levels of pressure. I know how the media will hype him up and he'll most likely go back and sign a bumper contract.
0
  • History
Showing previous versions of this text.
I actually watched the entire 95 minutes. Wolves have a woeful record defensively when playing with a 4 man defence. In the first half, they were playing like it was a training game. Every time they were in west ham's box, they'd leave max 2-3 players. So easy for west ham to exploit. Second half, I didn't see lingard. A ghost. The second 45 minutes and 5 minutes of added time, the only time i saw him was when he was time wasting or when he got cramp.
Load More
. . . Speak Your Mind . . .
Please log in or sign up to comment.
  • SAY IT
    Choose your color