Forum
{{ post.commentCount }}

Didn't find anything.

{{ searchResult.errors[0] }}



Wolverhampton Wanderers *
Canceled Abandoned
:
vs
HT {{ maCtrl.match.homeScoreHT }} : {{ maCtrl.match.awayScoreHT }}
FT {{ maCtrl.match.homeScoreFT }} : {{ maCtrl.match.awayScoreFT }}
ET {{ +maCtrl.match.homeScoreET + +maCtrl.match.homeScoreFT }} : {{ +maCtrl.match.awayScoreET + +maCtrl.match.awayScoreFT }}
PEN {{ maCtrl.match.homeScorePEN }} : {{ maCtrl.match.awayScorePEN }}
West Ham United *
{{ maCtrl.match.homeAggrWin ? maCtrl.match.homeTeam.name : maCtrl.match.awayTeam.name }} win {{ maCtrl.match.homeScoreAggr || 0 }} : {{ maCtrl.match.awayScoreAggr || 0 }} on aggregate {{ maCtrl.match.homeAggrWin ? maCtrl.match.homeTeam.name : maCtrl.match.awayTeam.name }} win on away goals rule after {{ maCtrl.match.homeScoreAggr }} : {{ maCtrl.match.awayScoreAggr }} aggregate {{ maCtrl.match.homeAggrWin ? maCtrl.match.homeTeam.name : maCtrl.match.awayTeam.name }} win {{ maCtrl.match.homeScorePEN }} : {{ maCtrl.match.awayScorePEN }} on penalties after {{ maCtrl.match.homeScoreAggr || 0 }} : {{ maCtrl.match.awayScoreAggr || 0 }} aggregate
Aggregate score {{ maCtrl.match.homeScoreAggr }} : {{ maCtrl.match.awayScoreAggr }}

  • {{ maCtrl.match.homeTeam.name }}
  • Goals
  • {{ maCtrl.lastname(event.player.name) }} ({{ event.elapsed }}')
  • Cards
  • {{ maCtrl.lastname(event.player.name) }} ({{ event.elapsed }}')
  • {{ maCtrl.match.awayTeam.name }}
  • Goals
  • {{ maCtrl.lastname(event.player.name) }} ({{ event.elapsed }}')
  • Cards
  • {{ maCtrl.lastname(event.player.name) }} ({{ event.elapsed }}')
{{ maCtrl.homeTeamPerformancePoll.totalVotes + maCtrl.awayTeamPerformancePoll.totalVotes }} Votes
Wolverhampton Wanderers vs West Ham United
Team Performance
3 Comments
BigCity 3 years ago
Manchester City, USA 0 200
How much do you think Lingard will cost city?
0
Gennady 3 years ago
Manchester United 284 3961
Damn Lingard is on fire
2
milanlamiavita 3 years ago Edited
Bustese Milano City, Italy 4 3418
I actually watched the entire 95 minutes. Wolves have a woeful record defensively when playing with a 4 man defence. In the first half, they were playing like it was a training game. Every time they were in west ham's box, they'd leave max 2-3 players. So easy for west ham to exploit. Second half, I didn't see lingard. A ghost. The second 45 minutes and 5 minutes of added time, the only time i saw him was when he was time wasting or when he got cramp.
With nearly 25 years of seeing hype around English players, it's easy to see that Lingard is not good enough for Man utd. Teams play differently vs a 'big' club that they'd do vs West ham. Completely differing levels of pressure. I know how the media will hype him up and he'll most likely go back and sign a bumper contract.
0
  • History
Showing previous versions of this text.
I actually watched the entire 95 minutes. Wolves have a woeful record defensively when playing with a 4 man defence. In the first half, they were playing like it was a training game. Every time they were in west ham's box, they'd leave max 2-3 players. So easy for west ham to exploit. Second half, I didn't see lingard. A ghost. The second 45 minutes and 5 minutes of added time, the only time i saw him was when he was time wasting or when he got cramp.
Load More
. . . Speak Your Mind . . .
Please log in or sign up to comment.
  • SAY IT