Chelsea vs Ajax (5 Nov 2019) 🔥 Video Highlights

Mauricio_elmessiah 6 years ago

Tottenham Hotspur, Croatia 0 581

imo there should have been 1 more red card for ajax and a pen for chelsea, ref was shit!

MikeHawk 6 years ago

Arsenal, France 0 292

Chelsea not going to go far. 2 of their goal came from PEN. Gifted them 2 easy goal

aniesdo 6 years ago

Chelsea, Nigeria 0 74

Ajax will be going very far because they play good football and don't mind benefitting from a few own-goals? Your logic though. If you really know football, you will understand that playing beautiful football alone don't always win you titles. You also need a few decisions go your way as well. In Chelsea's case they were valid, emotions aside.

Ledley 6 years ago

Celtic, Australia 46 1310

I have to say this. Ajax, don’t celebrate 🎉 too early!

mfharis 6 years ago

0 405

Ajay didn't know banana would come in to rescue Chelsea

porkey 6 years ago

Liverpool, Trinidad and Tobago 9 85

what a joke

bluesforlife 6 years ago

Chelsea, Malta 0 36

Haters gonna hate potatoes gonna potato hahahaha and without emerson rudiger kante and loftus cheek possibly sancho next year haha

InPepWeTrust 6 years ago

Manchester City, England 0 283

both clubs were lucky. 2 OG for Ajax and PEN for Chelsea

firasb 6 years ago

Chelsea 0 233

well said...for some reason ppl forgot the two own goals..but I would say Chelsea lucky for the two red cards but the penalties are deserved

binjai 6 years ago

0 1223

Stupid. Own goal because of the pressure while red card due to impotence of the referee.then too many deluded Chelsea fans becoming annoying af

julianlaci6 6 years ago

Albania 0 84

@binjai They were both red cards and the penalty was a penalty.Go cry elsewhere.

rulsalka 6 years ago

Boca Juniors, Thailand U23 0 168

bayern 1 red card 1-5 lose..

AnacondaRifle 6 years ago

Chelsea, England 0 242

Comeback king. I said it before and I'll say it again this will be our year.

Latif252 6 years ago

Chelsea, England 0 7

All i wanna hear is crying haters 😂

notmessi 6 years ago

Manchester City 0 22

Chelsea fans should be worried, what a poor performance that was.

SilverLining 6 years ago

Chelsea, England 0 729

Both penalty decisions were correct, and Daley Blind would have been booked for that tackle from behind on Odio if he wasn't already on a yellow. He deserved his matching orders for that coward desperate successive tackles on TWO Chelsea players to stop Chelsea from going any further, not forgetting the meagre four minutes of injury time added on when it should have been at least 10. So if anyone is left on Footyroom with a functioning braincells ( I highly doubt it), who can explain to me how Chelsea were lucky I would very much appreciate it. I wouldn't hold my breath thought. I am not that bitter about coming out with a point even though we played 24 minutes (including injury time) against 8 outfield Ajax players. To come from 4-1down to claim a point is remarkable !

Hottinho 6 years ago Edited

0 272

Fairly simple: To come back from 1-4 you need luck. Be that luck via stupid ref decisions or through studpidity of your opponents. In this match it was far more of the latter but still needed some luck in the ref's decisions, too. The yellow for Blind's second tackle was harsh but okay (the first tackle was completely fair and not cowardly at all, he was just quicker, take off your Chelsea-couloured glasses, mate!). And the yellow for Veltman was waaay over the top. Chelsea showed morale but they probably wouldn't have come back had the ref and Ajax not helped.

Showing previous versions of this text.

6 years ago

Fairly simple: To come back from 1-4 you need luck. Be that luck via stupid ref decisions or through studpidity of your opponents. In this match it was far more of the latter. The yellow for Blind's second tackle was harsh but okay (the first tackle was completely fair and not cowardly at all, he was just quicker, take off your Chelsea-couloured glasses, mate!). And the yellow for Veltman was waaay over the top. Chelsea showed morale but they probably wouldn't have come back had the ref and Ajax not helped.

iveroon 6 years ago

Juventus, Italy 0 342

Nice £71M Goalkeeping

TheMarvelous 6 years ago

Barcelona, Indonesia 0 706

Yet you still use syekni

Rated22 6 years ago

Liverpool, Mongolia 0 1

Man of the match is clearly the referee!!! It's always fun to watch Ajax!!

Marcus2011 6 years ago

Chelsea FC, England 277 6501

I thought we shouldn’t concede 4 at our homeground. I thought referee decisions equally went wrong both ways. However, main attention is again on VAR because yet again it fails. They used VAR to even out referees mess ups. Two wrongs don’t make it right.

mon3yteam 6 years ago

Manchester United, England 0 8

Horrendous refereeing imo. Never a penalty, never a red card either. Ajax were the better team and should've won comfortably. It's insane how they were still going for the winner with only 9 men.

aniesdo 6 years ago

Chelsea, Nigeria 0 74

Never a penalty? then Azpi's goal should have stood. The second yellow was for handling the ball in the box. If in doubt, check other games where the ball was handled in the area, the offending player received a yellow card. Why was this any different? Chelsea didn't make the rules.

AnneFlank 6 years ago

Chelsea, Egypt 0 17

I'm sorry but you didn't watch the game if you say "ajax were the better team"

Footy_watch 6 years ago Edited

Arsenal, Brazil 28 1944

11 vs 11 Ajax 4-2, they were clearly the better side and wouldve most likely won comfortably until the referee ruined the game. Chelsea's 2nd half resurgence doesnt change the fact that they were still losing 4-2 and still struggled to a draw against 9 men

Showing previous versions of this text.

6 years ago

11 vs 11 Ajax 4-2, they were clearly the better side and wouldve most likely won comfortably until the referee ruined the game.

6 years ago

11 vs 11 Ajax 4-2, they were clearly the better side and wouldve most likely won comfortably until the referee ruined the game. Chelsea's 2nd half resurgence doesnt change the fact that they were still losing 4-2

SilverLining 6 years ago

Chelsea, England 0 729

Chelsea had 10 shots on target and Ajax had 5, four of which they scored from, yet this numpty think Ajax"dominated" the match. Dominated what part of the match ? Possessions ? I think you will find in the stats above that Chelsea had more possessions that Ajax. Clearly, there are too many brainless idiots on Footyroom!.

julianlaci6 6 years ago

Albania 0 84

A penalty and 2 red cards imo.Decent refereeing.Chelsea was the better team and deserved all 3 points.

mon3yteam 6 years ago

Manchester United, England 0 8

@Julianlaci6 you're delusional mate. You must've watched the game after the red cards if you think Chelsea were better!

busstop2001 6 years ago

0 188

Terrible decision on the hand ball. Not sure what he did to earn the second yellow which rather turned the game. Down to ten facing a free kick outside the box was enough.

aniesdo 6 years ago

Chelsea, Nigeria 0 74

That's your opinion and it's fully respected but the ref let play continue as there was the advantage for Chelsea and as a result the player handled the ball in the box. Do you expect that the ref take it back for an initial free kick. I don't know how fans interpret the game these days. If you however think that wasn't a penalty, then you'd agree Azpi's goal should have stood because Tammy handled the ball in a similar fashion.

AnneFlank 6 years ago Edited

Chelsea, Egypt 0 17

In the champions league any hand in the box is considered a handball, until they change that we can't really say anything about it. The 2nd yellow on Veltman was for handball and dissent.

Showing previous versions of this text.

6 years ago

In the champions league any hand in the box is considered a handball, until they change that we can't really say anything about it. The 2nd yellow on Veltman was for dissent.

Hottinho 6 years ago

0 272

handball in the box isnt neccessarily yellow! That's the problem. Everything else was absolutely rightly decided by the ref!

julianlaci6 6 years ago

Albania 0 84

Thats a penalty everywhere not only in the Champions League.His hands stopped a shot on targed and were not close to his body.He also had plenty of time to get them out of the way but he leaned towards the ball with his hand.

FollowTheBall 6 years ago

Borussia Dortmund, Germany 0 6

Watching this just makes me angry. Where should he keep his hands? thats never a penalty

AnneFlank 6 years ago

Chelsea, Egypt 0 17

Sadly that's the rules in the Champions League now, any hand is a penalty.

FootyatMIT 6 years ago

Chelsea, Brazil 0 64

Have you not ever seen players hold both arms behind their back when blocking in the box?

Why risk a penalty and getting carded?

julianlaci6 6 years ago

Albania 0 84

His was leaning towards the ball with his hand.They were not close to his body.He clearly stopped a shot on targed with his hand.The shot was like 10 meters away from him so he had plenty of time to get them out.Definitely a pen.

Xpose2cold 6 years ago Edited

Chelsea, England & Nigeria 0 761

What a match. When Ajax led 1-4 I was thinking game over, on to the next one and then the comeback happened that made me not regret walking away and not watch the match any further. Both teams played well particularly Ajax. Onana was strong in goal and OH, I like how Zouma ran from one end of the field to another and shot over the bar, what a goal that could have been if the shot went in. More time should have added at the end of the 90 mins.

Showing previous versions of this text.

6 years ago

What a match. When Ajax led 1-4 I was thinking game over, on to the next one and then the comeback happened that made not regret walking away and not watch the match any further. Both teams played well particularly Ajax. Onana was strong in goal and OH, I like how Zouma ran from one end of the field to another and shot over the bar, what a goal that could have been if the shot went in. More time should have added at the end of the 90 mins.

xumeey 6 years ago Edited

Liverpool 0 1462

Ajax got robbed. And we thought the EPL refs were the worst. WTF was that second red card for?

Showing previous versions of this text.

6 years ago

Ajax got robbed. And we thought the EPL refs were shit. WTF was that second red card for?

6 years ago

Ajax got robbed. And we thought the EPL refs were worst. WTF was that second red card for?

This comment is disliked by many users (show)

Footy_watch 6 years ago

Arsenal, Brazil 28 1944

Ajax destroyed Chelsea in their own ground. Chelsea are an embarrassmrnt to the champions league.

julianlaci6 6 years ago

Albania 0 84

3-4 with 1 red card do you think Ajax wouldve gotten a different result here?
We were all over them during the second half.What did they get robbed of?

julianlaci6 6 years ago

Albania 0 84

You didnt even watch the game,so dont even bother.

Roadcrew 6 years ago Edited

Chelsea 0 224

@Footy_watch we won in their homeground and they drew in ours. So what embarrasment you are talking about? This is champions league level here not europa league level so 4rsena1 fans can fuck off!

Showing previous versions of this text.

6 years ago

@Footy_watch we won in their homeground and they drew in ours. So what embarrasment you are talking about? This is champions league level here not europa league level so 4rsena1 fans can't fuck off!

xumeey 6 years ago

Liverpool 0 1462

10 men is 100x better than 9 men. The fact that they were away, down to 9 men and more than 20 mins to play, and still didn't lose to Chelsea makes them winners. Whatever the outcome might have been that second red card was a total BS and Chelsea still couldn't beat them.

FootyatMIT 6 years ago

Chelsea, Brazil 0 64

@Footy_watch what are you smoking? Ajax scored 4 goals with 11 players, not 9. They were lucky Chelsea were disallowed a goal

xumeey 6 years ago

Liverpool 0 1462

I don't have to watch the full game to recognize the second red card was BS. I have nothing against Chelsea and I hope you guys make it out but the ref clearly helped you guys in this game.

FootyatMIT 6 years ago

Chelsea, Brazil 0 64

Ajax players were sent off shows that their defenders weren’t ready Chelsea’s attacks. That’s football, slip up and you get carded.

Chelsea weren’t just handed an easy end of the game, they fought hard for it and scared Ajax into making mistakes

Footy_watch 6 years ago

Arsenal, Brazil 28 1944

How were ajax lucky with Azpi's goal being ruled out when Abraham clearly handballed it?

aniesdo 6 years ago Edited

Chelsea, Nigeria 0 74

The second yellow must have been as a result of the player saying something unpleasant to the ref. We await for any report on that. But the ref would not just send a player off with a second yellow for fun of it.

Update: the second yellow was for handling the ball which is a standard practice if a penalty was awarded.

Showing previous versions of this text.

6 years ago

The second yellow must have been as a result of the player saying something unpleasant to the ref. We await for any report on that. But the ref would not just send a player off with a second yellow for fun of it.

AnneFlank 6 years ago

Chelsea, Egypt 0 17

@Footy_watch even before the red cards we were dominating them on all fronts. And you saying "even at 9 men they could've one" because they had one shot on target that Kepa saved is of no value. You can't use that and then say oh well with 11 men they would've won. That's all fairytale thinking. And if you think in this flawed manner then we (Chelsea) had 10 or so chances in the 2nd half so we "would've" won

julianlaci6 6 years ago

Albania 0 84

Ajax were trying to run away with a cheap game.Scored 3 goals with 1 shot on targed in the first half and scored another sucker punch at Chelseas best moment.Apart from those goals Chelsea was the better side in both legs.

Echo_R6 6 years ago

Arsenal, Singapore 1 412

@roadcrew fuck your mum rent boy fag. chelshit will get their ass whooped in the last 16 twat

CFC1999 6 years ago

Chelsea, Indonesia 0 5

Ajax pretty lucky that Azpi’s goal was canceled out. Even with 11 men Ajax, Super Frank Team was already on the driving seat since the begining of the second half. It just matter of time for chelsea to find all the goals, Ajax center halves already crumbled. What a performances by the young James, perfect Attacking WB! I hope Next match frank would take that Alonslow off put Azpi on the left and go for Reece James on the right.

aniesdo 6 years ago

Chelsea, Nigeria 0 74

When I saw the lineup, I was shocked with the inclusion of Alonso. He proved me right during the game. Too slow in everything including decision-making. He might be the next to depart after Luiz as Lamps likes players who are quick in movement.

Footy_watch 6 years ago Edited

Arsenal, Brazil 28 1944

The fact that Ajax couldve won with 9 men shows they wouldve scored more without the help of the referee, like what bayern did to bottlenham. Abraham handballed it, nothing lucky about ruling the goal out

Showing previous versions of this text.

6 years ago

Too much delusion. The fact that Ajax couldve won with 9 men shows they wouldve scored more like what bayern did to bottlenham.

6 years ago

Too much delusion. The fact that Ajax couldve won with 9 men shows they wouldve scored more without the help of the referee, like what bayern did to bottlenham. Abraham handballed it, nothing lucky about ruling the goal out

HaXXspetten 6 years ago

Sweden 0 883

Chelsea got two penalties and Ajax got two red cards and you complain about Ajax being lucky? Really?

fifarulzftbl 6 years ago

Manchester United, Germany 0 81

Kepa can do everything. Last season he was managing Chelsea and now he has scored a brilliant headed goal. Someone give him the Ballon D'or!

Substitutions

Bench

Missing Players