Overrated, but not the most.

Because they believe that firing Raneiri is not betraying the loyalty but Kante leaving the club is

@Marcus2011 I don't blame Kante for leaving Leicester to play with a bigger club and bigger wages as he deserves just like I don't blame Mahrez for trying to go to Man City. But if Kante actually stayed in Leicester I think they would of beat Chelsea cause all Leicester needed is a player like Kante to provide them the class balls he gives to his teammates and his lightning runs with the ball to Vardy.

I see big team fans always cheer and clap for their ex player..and small teams do the opposite..

@firasb Explain Liverpool booing Sterling then.

Out of topic here, but why tf do people say "would of", "could of", etc. Is it the new trend or what??

like Juventus didnt deserve to advance to quarter final in UCL because Tottenham clearly better sides at two legs ?

@LOSTerry We made a comeback on Spurs, keep hatin'. We're taking our revenge on Real Madrid also look out for that, stay hatin'.

That's the difference Chelsea has better player and a better coach that wins the game.

i do agree with u..stat showed it all..i think chelsea performance not really that good..hope chelsea will perform better for the next game

@Rifi331 I created this account just to reply to u. "would of" and "could of" is a mistake. In speech, saying "would've" or "could've" sounds just like "would of" or "could of" and therefore people make the mistake of writing it out as that. The correct phrase is of course "would've" or "would have".

@pronta exactly, I know the theory and I understand it might be confusing to some people. but I've seen people, they're being corrected with the right terms, but yet they still choose to use that "would of" thing. Makes me kind of wonder are they doing it on purpose? Or is there any chance that it's the new trend or something? I'm not trying to pick a fight here. Just pure curiosity