Green arrow = goodlooking freekick goal
Red arrow = ugly freekick goal

Thats atleast what I think, post your opinion

I don't think I share your characterization of "ugly" as I've seen some sublime top corner finishes on the far post. I think a more interesting question would be "Of those that are on target, what is relative success rate of near vs far post kicks. If I had to guess, I would think the near post would have a higher success as it usually harder for the keeper to make up ground once the ball is over the wall and on target. From that perspective, the "ugly" freekicks are even harder.

Don't quite see how a goal scored past the wall can be called ugly or cheap, if anything it should be harder as that is classed as the goalkeepers side of the wall.

problem?

^ That free kick is a masterpiece :)..

Why are you guys beeing so stuck up and thumbing me down.. 

@quickzyyy dont take everything personaly

IT WAS WHAT I WAS THINKING.. stop acting all angry ans shiiii

I prefer sick curlers of the likes of Beckham Pirlo and Riquelme but that's my taste. And remember a beautiful goal and an ugly goal are worth the same amount. 

There would never be anyone as good as Beckham for freekicks, he has a very high average of fk scored/shot

A goal from a free kick is always a piece of hard work, determination and skill. I don't think there's such thing as a 'cheap or ugly free kick' as long as you don't flop!

knibis dat was ur shit logic

^ to express what i think