Virgil Van Dijk on the move?

Eden17Hazard17 8 years ago

Chelsea FC 157 4232

He was wearing this at Southampton's secret santa...

A photo posted by JOSE FONTE (@f6nte) on Dec 24, 2016 at 9:27am PST

Comments

Emobot7 8 years ago

543 11478

OH SH...!!!

Anyway, if he does move, the saint will get plenty for him from what I heard, so its not all bad. Just checked right now and rumours say's Southampton want 60 million £ for him. Considering what City paid for Stone (XD), I don't think they would be able to pay that. Then again, if Stone is worth 47.5M, then Van Djik is certainly worth at least 60M. XD

Aiden_Finland 8 years ago Edited

Real Madrid, Finland 18 1236

Southampton know how to make money they purchased Van Dijk for £11.5m and are about to make around £48.5m if Van Dijk leaves.I prefer him to stay because he is the Sergio Ramos of Southampton.

Showing previous versions of this text.

2016-12-25 01:35:19

Southampton know how to make money they purchased Van Dijk for £11.5m and are about to make around £38.5m if Van Dijk leaves.I prefer him to stay because he is the Sergio Ramos of Southampton.

SunFlash 8 years ago

USA 19 3260

He's an excellent defender, quietly one of the best in the league the past few years. If he gets a move, he deserves it.

saatvik10 8 years ago

Manchester United, India 27 540

Does nobody notice the life size cutout of Ronaldo in the right??

kyoekyar 8 years ago

12 163

How can city buy these players without breaking FFF?

SunFlash 8 years ago

USA 19 3260

They make a ton of money. FFF is used to prevent clubs from spending beyond their means and folding. City would have to buy everyone on Earth to run out of money.

Emobot7 8 years ago Edited

543 11478

While talking about Van Djik going to City to fix the defense, can we also discuss what a stupid idea it was from City and Pep to buy Stones, especially for this ridiculous prize. I mean, he wasn't so good in the 2015-2016 season in my opinion and was quite a bit overated in my opinion. Even I at first was thinking Pep would make him a better defender but its certainly didn't turn this way, as it. I would even ask if they wouldn't have been better keeping Mangala instead. :S I mean, it might have been a move for the future, but for that kind of money, it seem like a very big risk, especially considering the lack of decent player at his position to replace him when he is not consistent.

Showing previous versions of this text.

2016-12-26 00:24:50

While talking about Van Djik going to City to fix the defense, can we also discuss what a stupid idea it was from City and Pep to buy Stone, especially for this ridiculous prize. I mean, he wasn't so good in the 2015-2016 season in my opinion and was quite a bit overated in my opinion. Even I at first was thinking Pep would make him a better defender but its certainly didn't turn this way, as it. I would even ask if they wouldn't have been better keeping Mangala instead. :S I mean, it might have been a move for the future, but for that kind of money, it seem like a very big risk, especially considering the lack of decent player at his position to replace him when he is not consistent.