Virgil Van Dijk on the move?

Eden17Hazard17 10 years ago

Chelsea FC 157 4232

He was wearing this at Southampton's secret santa...

A photo posted by JOSE FONTE (@f6nte) on Dec 24, 2016 at 9:27am PST

Comments

Emobot7 10 years ago

545 11516

OH SH...!!!

Anyway, if he does move, the saint will get plenty for him from what I heard, so its not all bad. Just checked right now and rumours say's Southampton want 60 million £ for him. Considering what City paid for Stone (XD), I don't think they would be able to pay that. Then again, if Stone is worth 47.5M, then Van Djik is certainly worth at least 60M. XD

Aiden_Finland 10 years ago Edited

Real Madrid, Finland 18 1236

Southampton know how to make money they purchased Van Dijk for £11.5m and are about to make around £48.5m if Van Dijk leaves.I prefer him to stay because he is the Sergio Ramos of Southampton.

Showing previous versions of this text.

2016-12-25 01:35:19

Southampton know how to make money they purchased Van Dijk for £11.5m and are about to make around £38.5m if Van Dijk leaves.I prefer him to stay because he is the Sergio Ramos of Southampton.

SunFlash 10 years ago

USA 19 3260

He's an excellent defender, quietly one of the best in the league the past few years. If he gets a move, he deserves it.

saatvik10 10 years ago

Manchester United, India 27 540

Does nobody notice the life size cutout of Ronaldo in the right??

kyoekyar 10 years ago

12 163

How can city buy these players without breaking FFF?

SunFlash 10 years ago

USA 19 3260

They make a ton of money. FFF is used to prevent clubs from spending beyond their means and folding. City would have to buy everyone on Earth to run out of money.

Emobot7 10 years ago Edited

545 11516

While talking about Van Djik going to City to fix the defense, can we also discuss what a stupid idea it was from City and Pep to buy Stones, especially for this ridiculous prize. I mean, he wasn't so good in the 2015-2016 season in my opinion and was quite a bit overated in my opinion. Even I at first was thinking Pep would make him a better defender but its certainly didn't turn this way, as it. I would even ask if they wouldn't have been better keeping Mangala instead. :S I mean, it might have been a move for the future, but for that kind of money, it seem like a very big risk, especially considering the lack of decent player at his position to replace him when he is not consistent.

Showing previous versions of this text.

2016-12-26 00:24:50

While talking about Van Djik going to City to fix the defense, can we also discuss what a stupid idea it was from City and Pep to buy Stone, especially for this ridiculous prize. I mean, he wasn't so good in the 2015-2016 season in my opinion and was quite a bit overated in my opinion. Even I at first was thinking Pep would make him a better defender but its certainly didn't turn this way, as it. I would even ask if they wouldn't have been better keeping Mangala instead. :S I mean, it might have been a move for the future, but for that kind of money, it seem like a very big risk, especially considering the lack of decent player at his position to replace him when he is not consistent.