StevenLFC
10 years ago
{{ searchResult.errors[0] }}
StevenLFC
10 years ago
ramaboy10
10 years ago
I doubt the top 4 will be spending big for a while
CroatiaFan123
10 years ago
Damn we buy something...
Eden17Hazard17
10 years ago
Amazing business. After the arrivals of Costa, Fabregas, Luis, Didier, Remy and Pasalic, our net spend is -0.8
quikzyyy
10 years ago
Edited
Okay, can someone explain me this?
In first table we(Arsenal) spend about 80M (+/-) and we are second.
How there's no Chelsea when they spend about 85M (+/-) ?
How there's Liverpool with spending 55M (+/-), when they actually spend about 116 according to the second table?
I know both Chelsea and Liverpool received money from transfers, and Chelsea is in profit but, if Chelsea is not there because of the money they received, why money Arsenal received is not counted?
Okay, can someone explain me this?
In first table we(Arsenal) spend about 80M (+/-) and we are second.
How there's no Chelsea when they spend about 85M (+/-) ?
How there's Liverpool with spending 55M (+/-), when they actually spend about 116 according to the second table?
I know both Chelsea and Liverpool received money from transfers, and Chelsea is in profit but, that first table is total bull*hit.
manchesterutI
10 years ago
@quikzyyy
The first table is the net spending meaning the difference between spent and received. Chelsea has almost 0 net thats why they aren't in that table. I believe the 1st table is the net spend data from the second table. Table two is not up to date I would assume, because of Note 1 underneath the table. Also, I would assume both tables are from different websites since one is in Euro and the other is in Pounds.
KingHenry
10 years ago
Edited
@quikzyyy we didn't sell anyone. Apart from vermaelen, no one worth mentioning. Sagna and Fabianski both left on a free transfer. Chelsea did great business, it's a good thing we're not restrained by the FFP else we would have been fucked. Chelsea did well to sell players the way they did.
EDIT : look at what I just found.
@quikzyyy we didn't sell anyone. Apart from vermaelen, no one worth mentioning. Sagna and Fabianski both left on a free transfer. Chelsea did great business, it's a good thing we're not restrained by the FFP else we would have been fucked. Chelsea did well to sell players the way they did.
tiki_taka
10 years ago
Edited
The sales should have been included, anyway what cup did Spurs win ? Capital cup ?
Eden17Hazard17
10 years ago
^Indeed. The sales should have been included. Mourinho - "Chelsea is a selling club."
manchesterutI
10 years ago
Tiki I think it was the league cup where they beat Chelsea 2-1 in the final. I might be mistaken though.