Forum
{{ post.commentCount }}

Didn't find anything.

{{ searchResult.errors[0] }}



Stamford Bridge expansion plans : 60.000 seats, 500M£ renovation.
tiki_taka 9 years ago Edited
Barcelona, France 367 9768

Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich will unveil Stamford Bridge expansion plans as club aim to increase capacity to 60,000.

- Chelsea's Russian owner Roman Abramovich wants Stamford Bridge to be a cathedral of football.
- Tuesday will mark the start of a three-day public consultation at the Bridge.
- Project to expand Stamford Bridge capacity from 42,000 to 60,000 will cost in excess of £500m.
- Abramovich has ruled out leaving Stamford Bridge on permanent basis.

Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich will unveil his remarkable vision for the future of the Premier League champions on Tuesday at the start of a three-day public consultation at Stamford Bridge.
The exhibition for local residents will be the first glimpse for Chelsea fans of Abramovich’s blueprint for a rebuilt 60,000 stadium that he wants to be a cathedral of football, paying homage to the club’s history at their one and only venue.
The design of the four new stands will take their inspiration not from the uniform style of most recent stadiums, but from the buttresses, pillars and gothic architecture of Westminster Abbey in whose diocese Stamford Bridge once stood.

An impression of Chelsea’s new 60,000 stadium which has been inspired by Westminster Abbey

Here is what the South Stand at Stamford Bridge would look like if Chelsea's expansion plans come to fruition

Roman Abramovich has ruled out leaving Stamford Bridge as he wants it to become a cathedral of football

The North Stand, East Stand, South East Corner, South Stand and West Stand will be refurbished

Barclays Premier League outfit Chelsea plan to expand Stamford Bridge from 42,000 to 60,000

And the history of the club’s surrounding neighbourhood has been studied to the extent that a modern version of Stamford Bridge itself — first mentioned in 1410 to be in need of repairs in the court rolls of Henry IV — will be part of the grand design more than 600 years later, going back to the future.
This attention to detail has even included researching the exact shade of the original Chelsea blue.
The building plan — with no estimated cost at such an early stage but likely to be well in excess of the mooted £500million — is being financed by Abramovich, who is conducting the whole ambitious project as a separate entity run by his people away from Chelsea Football Club business.

He has assembled a professional A-list team comprising a masterplan architect (Lifschutz Davidson Sandilands), stadium architect (Herzog & De Meuron), strategic planners (Aecom), railways and transportation (WSP) and structural engineers (Schlaich Bergermann & Partner) to work on the plan.
It would see Chelsea spend three seasons playing at a temporary home, with Wembley and Twickenham two possibilities.
Abramovich, who bought Chelsea from Ken Bates in 2003, is understood in June 2013 to have finally reached the conclusion that the club should stay at Stamford Bridge and extend there rather than move elsewhere.

Here is an aerial view of how Stamford Bridge looked ahead of the 1993-94 Premier League campaign

Stamford Bridge looks remarkably different to how it was structured back in April 1959.

This follows a frustrating decade in which Abramovich examined a number of fanciful proposed alternative sites including Earls Court, Battersea Power Station, White City, and Chelsea and Westminster Hospital. But none proved feasible — with the only winners being those who collected the numerous consultancy fees.
Billionaire Abramovich’s eureka moment has led to his handpicked group working for two years towards this first consultancy exercise, which will take place in the East Stand.
The fine detail will see the Chelsea owner and his building team work within the contours of the current site at Stamford Bridge, with the new four stands even following the angles of the old singular North Stand and the shape of the ground as it was in 1939.

A general view of the huge crowd at Stamford Bridge for an England vs Scotland match in April 1913.

And here's how the stadium looked in 1922 - you can see 'Chelsea Football Club' on the side of the main stand

Chelsea will list their reasons for expanding Stamford Bridge to 60,000 at the three-day public consultation

A more recent aerial shot of the Blues' home gives a clear picture of the area around Stamford Bridge.

There's a world of difference between how the stadium looked back in the day and how it looks now.

Supporters leaving the new Stamford Bridge will be able to gain quicker access to Fulham Broadway stationMost of the new seating capacity will be in the South Stand and the two hotels on the concourse will be demolished, with Abramovich wanting his new Chelsea to be for football only.
The benefits to the neighbourhood will include long-planned pedestrian walkways above the railway lines that define the boundaries to two sides of the site, plus seats reserved for local residents.
Despite the disruption the building of a new stadium will cause to locals, Chelsea fans can be assured that it will at least guarantee the Abramovich ownership dynasty.Part of Roman’s reasons for wanting to spend the best part of another billion pounds on Chelsea is to eventually hand over a stadium fit for a European football superpower to his eldest son, 21-year-old Arkadiy, who has inherited his father’s love of the club.

Work is in progress when it comes to finalising plans for the expansion which would take years to complete

Chelsea could move to either Wembley Stadium (pictured) or Twickenham while Stamford Bridge is being rebuilt.

0
  • History
Showing previous versions of this text.

Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich will unveil Stamford Bridge expansion plans as club aim to increase capacity to 60,000.

- Chelsea's Russian owner Roman Abramovich wants Stamford Bridge to be a cathedral of football.
- Tuesday will mark the start of a three-day public consultation at the Bridge.
- Project to expand Stamford Bridge capacity from 42,000 to 60,000 will cost in excess of £500m.
- Abramovich has ruled out leaving Stamford Bridge on permanent basis.

Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich will unveil his remarkable vision for the future of the Premier League champions on Tuesday at the start of a three-day public consultation at Stamford Bridge.
The exhibition for local residents will be the first glimpse for Chelsea fans of Abramovich’s blueprint for a rebuilt 60,000 stadium that he wants to be a cathedral of football, paying homage to the club’s history at their one and only venue.
The design of the four new stands will take their inspiration not from the uniform style of most recent stadiums, but from the buttresses, pillars and gothic architecture of Westminster Abbey in whose diocese Stamford Bridge once stood.

An impression of Chelsea’s new 60,000 stadium which has been inspired by Westminster Abbey

Here is what the South Stand at Stamford Bridge would look like if Chelsea's expansion plans come to fruition

Roman Abramovich has ruled out leaving Stamford Bridge as he wants it to become a cathedral of football

The North Stand, East Stand, South East Corner, South Stand and West Stand will be refurbished

Barclays Premier League outfit Chelsea plan to expand Stamford Bridge from 42,000 to 60,000

And the history of the club’s surrounding neighbourhood has been studied to the extent that a modern version of Stamford Bridge itself — first mentioned in 1410 to be in need of repairs in the court rolls of Henry IV — will be part of the grand design more than 600 years later, going back to the future.
This attention to detail has even included researching the exact shade of the original Chelsea blue.
The building plan — with no estimated cost at such an early stage but likely to be well in excess of the mooted £500million — is being financed by Abramovich, who is conducting the whole ambitious project as a separate entity run by his people away from Chelsea Football Club business.

He has assembled a professional A-list team comprising a masterplan architect (Lifschutz Davidson Sandilands), stadium architect (Herzog & De Meuron), strategic planners (Aecom), railways and transportation (WSP) and structural engineers (Schlaich Bergermann & Partner) to work on the plan.
It would see Chelsea spend three seasons playing at a temporary home, with Wembley and Twickenham two possibilities.
Abramovich, who bought Chelsea from Ken Bates in 2003, is understood in June 2013 to have finally reached the conclusion that the club should stay at Stamford Bridge and extend there rather than move elsewhere.

Here is an aerial view of how Stamford Bridge looked ahead of the 1993-94 Premier League campaign

Stamford Bridge looks remarkably different to how it was structured back in April 1959.

This follows a frustrating decade in which Abramovich examined a number of fanciful proposed alternative sites including Earls Court, Battersea Power Station, White City, and Chelsea and Westminster Hospital. But none proved feasible — with the only winners being those who collected the numerous consultancy fees.
Billionaire Abramovich’s eureka moment has led to his handpicked group working for two years towards this first consultancy exercise, which will take place in the East Stand.
The fine detail will see the Chelsea owner and his building team work within the contours of the current site at Stamford Bridge, with the new four stands even following the angles of the old singular North Stand and the shape of the ground as it was in 1939.

A general view of the huge crowd at Stamford Bridge for an England vs Scotland match in April 1913

Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich will unveil Stamford Bridge expansion plans as club aim to increase capacity to 60,000.

- Chelsea's Russian owner Roman Abramovich wants Stamford Bridge to be a cathedral of football.
- Tuesday will mark the start of a three-day public consultation at the Bridge.
- Project to expand Stamford Bridge capacity from 42,000 to 60,000 will cost in excess of £500m.
- Abramovich has ruled out leaving Stamford Bridge on permanent basis.

Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich will unveil his remarkable vision for the future of the Premier League champions on Tuesday at the start of a three-day public consultation at Stamford Bridge.
The exhibition for local residents will be the first glimpse for Chelsea fans of Abramovich’s blueprint for a rebuilt 60,000 stadium that he wants to be a cathedral of football, paying homage to the club’s history at their one and only venue.
The design of the four new stands will take their inspiration not from the uniform style of most recent stadiums, but from the buttresses, pillars and gothic architecture of Westminster Abbey in whose diocese Stamford Bridge once stood.

An impression of Chelsea’s new 60,000 stadium which has been inspired by Westminster Abbey

Here is what the South Stand at Stamford Bridge would look like if Chelsea's expansion plans come to fruition

Roman Abramovich has ruled out leaving Stamford Bridge as he wants it to become a cathedral of football

The North Stand, East Stand, South East Corner, South Stand and West Stand will be refurbished

Barclays Premier League outfit Chelsea plan to expand Stamford Bridge from 42,000 to 60,000

And the history of the club’s surrounding neighbourhood has been studied to the extent that a modern version of Stamford Bridge itself — first mentioned in 1410 to be in need of repairs in the court rolls of Henry IV — will be part of the grand design more than 600 years later, going back to the future.
This attention to detail has even included researching the exact shade of the original Chelsea blue.
The building plan — with no estimated cost at such an early stage but likely to be well in excess of the mooted £500million — is being financed by Abramovich, who is conducting the whole ambitious project as a separate entity run by his people away from Chelsea Football Club business.

He has assembled a professional A-list team comprising a masterplan architect (Lifschutz Davidson Sandilands), stadium architect (Herzog & De Meuron), strategic planners (Aecom), railways and transportation (WSP) and structural engineers (Schlaich Bergermann & Partner) to work on the plan.
It would see Chelsea spend three seasons playing at a temporary home, with Wembley and Twickenham two possibilities.
Abramovich, who bought Chelsea from Ken Bates in 2003, is understood in June 2013 to have finally reached the conclusion that the club should stay at Stamford Bridge and extend there rather than move elsewhere.

Here is an aerial view of how Stamford Bridge looked ahead of the 1993-94 Premier League campaign

Stamford Bridge looks remarkably different to how it was structured back in April 1959.

This follows a frustrating decade in which Abramovich examined a number of fanciful proposed alternative sites including Earls Court, Battersea Power Station, White City, and Chelsea and Westminster Hospital. But none proved feasible — with the only winners being those who collected the numerous consultancy fees.
Billionaire Abramovich’s eureka moment has led to his handpicked group working for two years towards this first consultancy exercise, which will take place in the East Stand.
The fine detail will see the Chelsea owner and his building team work within the contours of the current site at Stamford Bridge, with the new four stands even following the angles of the old singular North Stand and the shape of the ground as it was in 1939.

A general view of the huge crowd at Stamford Bridge for an England vs Scotland match in April 1913.

And here's how the stadium looked in 1922 - you can see 'Chelsea Football Club' on the side of the main stand

Chelsea will list their reasons for expanding Stamford Bridge to 60,000 at the three-day public consultation

A more recent aerial shot of the Blues' home gives a clear picture of the area around Stamford Bridge

Comments
JuanMata10 9 years ago
Chelsea, Austria 17 1696

This is pretty old news, actually, the exhibition at SB is already over, but - nonetheless - thanks for sharing, @tiki.

I, for one, am a massive fan of this design and from what I've read, most Chelsea fans share the same opinion as me, as it doesn't look like a, let's say, stadium from a catalogue, it is very different from the stadiums of our competitors in the Premier League. For example, Tottenham's new stadium doesn't look appealing at all, you could find quite a few stadiums like this in every country. Our planned stadium, on the other hand, is unique and that's what's so special about it.

The construction may be a real problem though, as the ground around Stamford Bridge is cropped to the last centimeter, so we'd have to pay compensation fees to the hotels, restaurants or to the individuals that settled down around our stadium. Additionally, we'll face the costs of tearing the buildings off and having to buy the ground/land. I highly doubt that this will only take 3 years to finish.

0
KTBFFHSWE 9 years ago
Chelsea FC, Sweden 52 2449

Stamford Bridge will look like a fucking church. Anyways, as I understand it there are a LOT of work and planning to be made before they go ahead with rebuilding the stadium, as well as a lot of instances to go through and get okays' from before they can go ahead with the process.

0
Eden17Hazard17 9 years ago
Chelsea FC 157 4232

As long as we go back to Stamford Bridge i'll be happy. The Bridge is where we belong, and I'll love to see it upgraded.

0
AlexBatak 9 years ago
Chelsea, Italy 204 2707

Wembley would be a great temporary stadium, it's like home anyways! ;)

2
JuanMata10 9 years ago
Chelsea, Austria 17 1696

All of us have the same picture ffs

0
AlexBatak 9 years ago
Chelsea, Italy 204 2707

I was wondering the same lol Someone accused me that you are all my accounts haha I had this profile picture first btw :)

0
SoccerBoss 9 years ago
Barcelona, Russia 34 804

HA! Perfect proof that all of these accounts are held by one person. Footyroom where are you?

0
Marcus2011 9 years ago
Chelsea FC, England 277 6501

I am going to change mine too :D

500 million is pretty expensive . And i don't like the design if that is how it will look .

Anyways I just love the fact that we took Wembley stadium by outbidding Spurs ))) They were not happy . I really want more than 60 k seats . I am sure we can fill them up , but I guess for now to keep electric atmosphere at the bridge , 60 k will be fine .

0
KTBFFHSWE 9 years ago
Chelsea FC, Sweden 52 2449

All Chelsea fans need to have that picture this year. After all we're the reigning champions of the EPL ;)

0
KTBFFHSWE 9 years ago Edited
Chelsea FC, Sweden 52 2449

@Marcus Twickenham Stadium would be good too. Used to go to school next to it and it's absolutely massive!

And the 500mil is quite expensive but as it is conducted as a separate entity run by Abramovich people away from Chelsea Football Club it won't affect the club that much! The design however.. I guess it's kinda unique, but I don't like it that much from what I can tell.. but then again it's not as if Stamford Bridge is anything spectacular atm either.. and I guess it would be wrong to put up this super modern new stadium in that area of London as well.. Would kinda destroy the infrastructure of the area..

btw, have you seen Spurs plans for their new stadium? <http://www.tottenhamhotspur.com/new-scheme/>

0
  • History
Showing previous versions of this text.

@Marcus Twickenham Stadium would be good too. Used to go to school next to it and it's absolutely massive!

And the 500mil is quite expensive but as it is conducted as a separate entity run by Abramovich people away from Chelsea
Football Club it won't affect the club that much! The design however.. I guess it's kinda unique, but I don't like it that much from what I can tell.. but then again it's not as if Stamford Bridge is anything spectacular atm either.. and I guess it would be wrong to put up this super modern new stadium in that area of London as well.. Would kinda destroy the infrastructure of the area..

btw, have you seen Spurs plans for their new stadium? http://www.tottenhamhotspur.com/new-scheme/

Dynastian98 9 years ago
Real Madrid 483 7140

I usually recognize the user by his picture, but the comments on this thread are so confusing.... I thought that JuanMata10 was talking to himself for a second there lol.

0
quikzyyy 9 years ago
Arsenal 429 9010

@Dynastian haha, exactly!
@KTBFFHSWE Yea, it looks great. The anticipated stadium opening date has been revised several times and is currently scheduled for the 2018–19 season. The new stadium will also serve as a venue for at least two NFL International Series games a season..

0
Marcus2011 9 years ago
Chelsea FC, England 277 6501

@ktbffhswe

I think we have restriction on capacity . Yeah that will good option too but Wembley is a special place . Even if the stadium fits 90 k , we are only allowed to sell 60 k seats . Although , I think we can sell 80 k week and week out no problem .

Stamford Bridge was good home , but I feel like Chelsea started new chapter in their history therefore new stadium and new location will be good . Plus it is located in Fulham ...

And Spurs project looks amazing .

0
KTBFFHSWE 9 years ago
Chelsea FC, Sweden 52 2449

"Stamford Bridge was good home , but I feel like Chelsea started new
chapter in their history therefore new stadium and new location will be
good . Plus it is located in Fulham ..." What do you mean mate?

Spurs project indeed looks amazing. And housing NFL games as well.. hm, okay. Wasn't there talk that some of the EPL games should be moved to the US as well at some time? Not very fond of that idea at all.

0
awais007 9 years ago
Chelsea, Pakistan 178 922

some are saying above is real model but some people are saying the below one is real model

0
KTBFFHSWE 9 years ago
Chelsea FC, Sweden 52 2449

That last one looks dangerous. Like some kind of super weapon. A dark dungeon. Batman cave like.

In the end, I think what we're going to see is a church like construction which might impress but that might fail as well. One thing is for certain, Stamford Bridge needs a tune up and building permissions for the stadium probably won't be voted through if it doesn't follow the design and structure of the surrounding area.

0
expertfootball11 9 years ago
Real Madrid, France 64 2837

I don't really know why English stadiums are so small in the first place, like 45.000 seats for an internationally-known club isn't enough. The same applies to Anfield, also around 45.000. And its very old and they should renovate it too.

0
AlexBatak 9 years ago
Chelsea, Italy 204 2707

It would look super!

0
Marcus2011 9 years ago
Chelsea FC, England 277 6501

Ehhh still not sure , maybe when it is done , I will like it . Maybe in person it will look much better ..

0