Say what you will about Jose Mourinho's tactics, but Chelsea Football Club's record is quite good against the top seven under his watch.

Chelsea fc vs Top Four this season:

Chelsea 2 Man city 1
Man City 0 Chelsea 1.
Man Utd 0 Chelsea 0.
Chelsea 3 Man Utd 1.
Arsenal 0 Chelsea 0.
Chelsea 6 Arsenal 0.
Chelsea 2 Liverpool 1.
Liverpool 0 Chelsea 2.

quite good? it is excellent dude

^ Sorry, It's Legen~wait for it~dary. :)

Yeah its good but the competition is not at its best either, Chelsea is the only experimented team in England after SAF departure. And CL results can prove it past years...

Liverpool and Man City : Incredible talent, but less experience and maturity, they could be stronger in the future.

Arsenal : An ever changing team with the departure of their best players every year + limited squad.

Man United : Ruined by Moyes amator management and poor signings.

Thats it, the level this year was very far from EPL fans expectations...

I dont know how did Chelsea managed to not win PL this year ??

Hey Tiki_taka :)
"I don't know how did Chelsea managed to not win PL this year?"

This season has been insanely tough for everyone and predicting results has been nearly impossible. Every club strengthened their squad this year. If you think every game was easy then you haven't follow the matches of bottom table games. Manchester City have a more experienced squad than us same with other top 7 but everyone dropped points, we still have to finally solve our missing puzzle and sign a 1 or 2 decent strikers. Imagine if we had Suarez and Sturridge upfront or Cavani and Costa or Aguero and Falcao then I would say that we have a complete team but with Torres, Ba & Etoo it's not the same. They rarely get a shot on target and it's ridiculous the amount of chances they missed. Next season we will definitely sign a 1 or 2 strikers.

Hey Alex :).

predicting results has been nearly impossible : I agree but just in first leg, time for players to adapt to the new coach tactics and new players, but really when you dont win a game, its fair-play to give credit to the rival, but its becoming the excuse number one for every critic.

A limited squad of Arsenal was the winner of first leg, that gives you just how was the competition this year, if the big teams fail to dominate smaller teams, thats good for the show...etc.

But it doesnt show how strong the competition is, i actually think it the opposite.

That might be right for a neutral point of view, but believe me, money is not everything and no matter how the media praise a club or a player more than another, that can't hide the truth that football is way more than that. The way Sunderland won against City and Chelsea was extremely impressive just to fight relegation. You can't say that big clubs should win always because they spend more in football or they have the right to win or so. It doesn't work like that most of the times.

This shows what Jose Mourinho is capable of doing. Smaller teams can always surprise you but your results against the big teams shows who you are. The biggest reason why Chelsea (probably) won't win the league is Liverpool's amazing run. Otherwise Chelsea was already champion against ManCity.

Mourinho's specialty is that he can win a match against a superior opposition with the inferior team. I bet you that if you gave him Swansea City and put him up against Man City twice, he'd produce results in at least one of those matches.

@Dynast: or perhaps he's just really good at proving that the team is not actually inferior, when they are organized properly.

@Dynast Well ill probably award Gus Poyet with that honour over Mourinho concidering budget and club.