Jimbet
5 years ago
Lol at Arsenal
☰
{{ searchResult.errors[0] }}
Jimbet
5 years ago
Lol at Arsenal
Golefty
5 years ago
How are chelsea's operation funds so low? I didnt think stamford bridge was that small.
Emobot7
5 years ago
@Jimbet Yep, thats what I thought when I first saw this. This and Manchester City absurd amount of owner financing.
Ledley
5 years ago
Hi Emo, I see the source is SwissRamble. But do they factor in the bottom club in the Premier League gets 100m pounds now due to the current TV rights deal? Or is that already factored in
Emobot7
5 years ago
@Ledley Propably they ignore that but I'm not completely sure. Seem likely though.
the_bald_genius
5 years ago
lol arsenal's owner wouldn't lay off a dime no wonder wenger is aging faster than einstein.
iHEARTfootball
5 years ago
LOL, it's clear as day for Arsenal now. Kroenke's sucking the life out of Arsenal day by day
Eden17Hazard17
5 years ago
Hey Middlesbrough, you alright down there?
Emobot7
5 years ago
@Eden17
Middlesbrough: Better than Sunderland at least. 8P
tiki_taka
5 years ago
Something is not clear, how Bournemouth doesn’t earn money outside of their owner’s finances ?
netsten
5 years ago
Edited
@Golefty
They spend just about everything they earn. And their model is very reliant on profitable player sales, which are not included in Operations here.
@Jimbet
They spend just about everything they earn. And their model is very reliant on profitable player sales, which are not included in Operations here.
Greatone
5 years ago
-this just shows how much FFP is making teams work towards a "sustainable model"
-looks at man city and chelsea
..lol
quikzyyy
5 years ago
FFP ain't for rich clubs...
but the fact that United got almost 10 times more money from operations than City is amazing. I'm kinda surprised that Sunderlad got a quite a lot from the owner, others were quite expected.
Oh dear...