Forum
{{ post.commentCount }}

Didn't find anything.

{{ searchResult.errors[0] }}



Lampard joined his new club
Gennady 10 years ago
Manchester United 284 3961

Frank Lampard signs for New York City on a free transfer.

Chelsea’s all-time leading goalscorer Frank Lampard has agreed a deal to join Manchester City’s US franchise, newly-formed MLS outfit New York City FC, according to reports from the Mirror.

0
Comments
GunnerAFC 10 years ago
Arsenal, England 47 1026

Apparently David Villa too? I'm not sure.

0
Gennady 10 years ago
Manchester United 284 3961

Yeah David Villa is about to sign as well. Both on free transfer, but NYCFC will play in MLS starting in 2015 season.

0
Iraqi_Madridista 10 years ago
Real Madrid 33 1388

MLS is a weird league. There is no history or any talent over there in the USA, the same goes for the leagues in Qatar or UAE. Old players who are almost retiring go to these leagues to make some money before they retire :D

0
gagagoodlife 10 years ago
Chelsea, England 14 325

So how does this MLS thing work??? You can form a club and start playing just like that?? They also don't have relegation like other leagues. It's a joke of a league.

0
Tuanis 10 years ago
Manchester United, England 86 2310

It's actually a very competitive league. They dont have relegation because they use their own "college teams" policies. They have the college league and the major league just like in all of their other sports. You can form a club like in any other part of the world, the thing is, the league announced they are going to expand the number of teams so many projects started to build clubs that will eventually meet requirements in order to be in the MLS as part of the expansion.

0
ramaboy10 10 years ago
Mauritius 285 6463

@Iraqi_Madrista they do that because they earn a ton of money and living in America is not bad. I'm pretty sure most players would do the same.

1
netsten 10 years ago
Chelsea, Belgium 44 992

0
Dephased 10 years ago
Arsenal, United States 12 501

I think its perfectly sensible for him to go to MLS atleast now that he is approaching the end of his career. I would live in America over England any day.

1
Lodatz 10 years ago
Tottenham Hotspur, England 150 4992

^ But, but... CAPITALISM!

0
Dephased 10 years ago
Arsenal, United States 12 501

Yes capitalism isnt good but that doesn't stop with from being a good place to live, but Norway which i have spent several years of my life in was under a socialist government for the last decade and it was near flawless except for the immigration politics.

0
Lodatz 10 years ago
Tottenham Hotspur, England 150 4992

So, maybe it was simply near flawless for YOU, because you're the right race? ;)

0
Dephased 10 years ago Edited
Arsenal, United States 12 501

No i think you misunderstood what i meant, it was too nice with immigrants. And the fact that you say that i was "the right race" means you don't understand politics. Socialism is left wing which promotes that all races should have equal rights while capitalism which is right wing means that immigrants should have limited rights. In Norway there is a lot of abuse of the welfare system by some immigrants and Norwegians alike but immigrants have been the biggest problem and mind you i am part "immigrant" myself.

0
  • History
Showing previous versions of this text.

No i think you misunderstood what i meant, it was too nice with immigrants. And the fact that you say that i was "the right race" means you don't understand politics. Socialism is left wing which promotes that all races should have equal rights while capitalism which is right wing means that immigrants should have limited rights. I Norway there is a lot of abuse of the welfare system by some immigrants and Norwegians alike but immigrants have been the biggest problem and mind you i am part "immigrant" myself.

Lodatz 10 years ago
Tottenham Hotspur, England 150 4992

"Socialism is left wing which promotes that all races should have equal rights while capitalism which is right wing means that immigrants should have limited rights. "

Neither of these things are true.

If that's what you think the left-right paradigm is based upon, then you probably should take some classes.

0
Dephased 10 years ago
Arsenal, United States 12 501

No it isn't but compared to each other that is what it is. And when i compared the too i meant Far right and Far left. National Socalism vs Communism. Compare, which is worse?

0
chelsea8 10 years ago
Chelsea, Iran 17 2219

being a chelsea fan whole my life and frank lampard being my idol, this is a really sad moment for me damn abramovich how could you do this

0
Lodatz 10 years ago Edited
Tottenham Hotspur, England 150 4992

"No it isn't but compared to each other that is what it is."

No, that's still not any more true.

The far right and far left extremes are not Nazism and the Soviet Union. Both of those systems would require totalitarian control, and an absence of democracy. They are not the paradigm that expresses 'right' and 'left' within political ideology.

The left sees property as a division among people, whereas the right relies upon property rights upheld by a State in order to function. Left-wing is the true anti-government ideology; true communism is an anarchistic model. I invite you to watch that video again. I read you an excerpt of a very influential component of real political thought in the history of the 'left'.

Marxism was not the only thinking taking place.

0
  • History
Showing previous versions of this text.

"No it isn't but compared to each other that is what it is."

No, that's still not any more true.

The far right and far left extremes are not Nazism and the Soviet Union. Both of those systems would requite totalitarian control, and an absence of democracy. They are not the paradigm that expresses 'right' and 'left' within political ideology.

The left sees property as a division among people, whereas the right relies upon property rights upheld by a State in order to function. Left-wing is the true anti-government ideology; true communism is an anarchistic model. I invite you to watch that video again. I read you a very influential component of real political thought in the history of the 'left'.

"No it isn't but compared to each other that is what it is."

No, that's still not any more true.

The far right and far left extremes are not Nazism and the Soviet Union. Both of those systems would requite totalitarian control, and an absence of democracy. They are not the paradigm that expresses 'right' and 'left' within political ideology.

The left sees property as a division among people, whereas the right relies upon property rights upheld by a State in order to function. Left-wing is the true anti-government ideology; true communism is an anarchistic model. I invite you to watch that video again. I read you an excerpt of a very influential component of real political thought in the history of the 'left'.

Marxism was not the only thinking taking place.

Gennady 10 years ago
Manchester United 284 3961

New York City FC first team squad from Wikipedia :))))

0
quikzyyy 10 years ago
Arsenal 429 9002

new NYC FC team

1