The general consensus is, yes, Sterling is overrated and overpriced.
From my perspective, it is easy to hop on that bandwagon, but in reality, I'm seeing a situation a lot like Bale, where the money being offered is so substantial that we tend to dismiss the player as "not being worth that much" and ignore the fact that they are a massive talent. I've seen a fair bit of Sterling, and he is one of the best young players in the world right now. If Man City have the dough, the need for English players, and the time to let him grow, I think it's a good investment.
Or, per Man City usual, the player will be put in a cluster**** where they end up warming the bench.
Who can tell? Ask me again in a few years.
Liverpool have reached an agreement with Manchester City over the transfer of Raheem Sterling, according to Sky sources. And we also understand that the fee for the England international is £49m, subject to certain add ons. The forward must now agree personal terms and undergo a medical.
£49m = 68m€
Well, perfect business by Liverpool, congratz. Thoughts?
Liverpool have reached an agreement with Manchester City over the transfer of Raheem Sterling, according to Sky sources.
And we also understand that the fee for the England international is £49m, subject to certain add ons.
The forward must now agree personal terms and undergo a medical.
£49m = 68m€
Well, perfect business by Liverpool, congratz.
Thoughts?