Lodatz
10 years ago
I'd be more convinced if they had an overlay on the side-camera, instead.
From the camera inside the goal it looked like it never crossed the line.
{{ searchResult.errors[0] }}
Lodatz
10 years ago
I'd be more convinced if they had an overlay on the side-camera, instead.
From the camera inside the goal it looked like it never crossed the line.
ashwin1729
10 years ago
Well, its good that they have both the side and back cameras...sometimes an angle missed by the side can be caught by the back and vice versa...I have no problem with it so far...but you know all good things come to an end by controversy, so I guess I am waiting for one... :D
It might have been very subtle, but during the France v. Honduras match, we football fans viewed something truly historical. For the first time ever in the world cup, goal line technology was implemented, and France rightfully were given a goal. It did not greatly interfere with the game and showed how valuable of a tool it can be for the referees. I am glad that now we can rely on this technology instead of human judgment to make split-second decisions.
It might have been very subtle, but during the France v. Honduras match, we football fans viewed something truly historical. For the first time ever in the world cup, goal line technology was implemented, and France rightfully were given a goal. It did not greatly interfere with the game and showed how valuable of a tool it can be for the referees in this match.
It might have been very subtle, but during the France v. Honduras match, we football fans viewed something truly historical. For the first time ever in the world cup, goal line technology was implemented, and France rightfully were given a goal. It did not greatly interfere with the game and showed how valuable of a tool it can be for the referees.