And this is why Garry Nevile is best pundit . Not because he defends Chelsea , but because he most unbiased and fairly balanced football pundit . He is very smart and tries to treat every team equally with fair points and very good arguments .

Again on this topic? It's an endless debate mate...

*Lets create a topic every time someone says something against Chelsea*

Nothing to debate here tuan . Everything is settled .

Just Sharing thoughts of the best english pundit . Kind of like fatality .

@quikzy

Yep , since day one till the last day for every thread against Chelsea there will be two threads . Just one more game and you won't hear from us till the august community shield .

carragher is also a good pundit too he does shows his biasness sometimes but he's actually pretty good as well

@Marcus "Just one more game and you won't hear from us till the august community shield."

I'm still waiting for the team picture holding the epl trophy to post something lol

@alex

Yes !!! Lets get that and then we are done .

@carrgher

In all honesty sometimes I don't understand what he is saying .... his accent lol and he is 50-50 bias and does not express his thoughts as good as Nevile and i don't always agree with his game analysis . ( not that I know anything close to him but waching and playing some football kind of gives me some perspective different to his )

Neville is right. The other teams have put up an absolute pathetic attempt at stopping Chelsea. They haven't even been close. No doubt that only one team deserves to win EPL.

carrgher's accent is horrible as hell.

Chelsea have won it. People accused Mourinho of playing boring... well, that is true in a sense. But Mourinho did what he had to do. His mentality is that he will do just enough to win. He did not want to take risks and attack when he can just take 1-0 wins or draw his way to the title. What was boring was the pathetic attempt of a title challenge put up by the combination of Arsenal, City, United, and Liverpool. Absolutely pathetic. I bet you Mourinho was bored more than we were from a lack of entertainment in the title race. Mourinho's pragmatic approach led him to do just what was needed to win. If the EPL teams were any better, they'd put up a much tighter title race, and Chelsea wouldn't have gotten away with the title this easily. In the end it didn't matter if Chelsea played boring this season or if we liked their footballing philosophy or not because all the other 'challengers' were so abysmal that Chelsea could've literally played however they liked and gotten away with the title.

People criticized Mourinho for losing at home to Sunderland last season. Well how about Pellegrini losing to Burnley?...

We moan as much as we can, but winner takes it all.