Morata. Much more experience in european competition, and they are at the same age, so that's saying something. He is so effective. As a Juve fan, i watched him come from the bench in extra time so many times and score the winning goal. It was insane, he's an instant game changer as a substitute. Everytime he came on as a substitute in a game where we needed a goal to win, i used to let out a sigh of relief, i knew it was only a matter of time till he scored the clutch goal. As a starting 11, he's quality, not going to be the leading goalscorer, but he's always where he needs to be on the pitch, lucky maybe, but quality nonetheless. Mandzukic has insane work rate, dybala is a false 9 who falls back. Morata was an insane cherry picker. Morata left, Higauin came in, same striking style. So....morata>>>paco
Morata. Much more experience in european competition, and they are at the same age, so that's saying something. He is so effective. As a Juve fan, i watched him come from the bench in extra time so many times and score the winning goal. It was insane, he's an instant game changer as a substitute. Everytime he came on as a substitute in a game where we needed a goal to win, i used to let out a igh of relief, i knew it was only a matter of time till he scored the clutch goal. As a starting 11, he's quality, not going to be the leading goalscorer, but he's always where he needs to be on the pitch, lucky maybe, but quality nonetheless. Mandzukic has insane work rate, dybala is a false 9 who falls back. Morata was an insane cherry picker. Morata left, Higauin came in, same striking style. So....morata>>>paco
So, guys, I've been thinking to do a debate thread since a long time and I finally decided to go ahead and proceed with my idea. So, heres the concept, I put a subject than is a bit controversial and you take a side and try to explain why you are right. Since we all know those kind of debate never really come to a end, your goal won't be to persuade the oposition but simply one or more person acting a neutral party in the debate. I'm of course will be one of those neutral (so we alway have at least one). Neutral party can ask question to get the debate going and after a while, will take side. The winner is the one who managed to convince the most neutral to agree with him.
The first debate is something I've seen a lot on social media because of the recent transfer of Pablo Alcacer to Barcelona: Morata or Alcacer, wich is better?
Here the link to the wikipedia page of the player for those who want to know more before starting off:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paco_Alc%C3%A1cer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%81lvaro_Morata
And some video of them:
May the debate begin!
So, guys, I've been thinking to do a debate thread since a long time and I finally decided to go ahead and proceed with my idea. So, heres the concept, I put a subject than is a bit controversial and you take a side and try to explain why you are right. Since we all know those kind of debate never really come to a end, your goal won't be to persuade the oposition but simply one or more person acting a neutral party in the debate. I'm of course will be one of those neutral (so we alway have at least one). Neutral party can ask question to get the debate going and after a while, will take side. The winner is the one who managed to convince the most neutral to agree with him.
The first debate is something I've seen a lot on social media because of the recent transfer of Pablo Alcacer to Barcelona: Morata and Alcacer, wich is better?
Here the link to the wikipedia page of the player for those who want to know more before starting off:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paco_Alc%C3%A1cer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%81lvaro_Morata
And some video of them:
May the debate begin!