You do realize that all Costa contributes to the team is goals, while Ronaldo does much more. He takes set pieces (and scores from them), is a natural leader on the pitch, drags away defenders to open up space from team mates, has to cross the ball in for others to score, all while constantly being marked by 2-3 men. Costa just poaches, and he is a good poacher at that too. Ronaldo's goals come from any and all angles. To be honest, I'm surprised Ronaldo even manages to average more than a goal per game with the amount men marking him simultaneously each game.
There is a reason why people say no one right now can touch Ronaldo and Messi, and that Ribery's performances in 2013 made the duo look less "otherworldly". "In total, the Costa has scored 27 times in 3,033 minutes - a goal every 112.33 minutes for the Rojiblancos. While Ronaldo has 36 strikes in 33 games for Madrid - one every 79.81 minutes overall." - says it all.
And the fact that you mentioned Real are capable of winning without Ronaldo, but Atleti can't without Costa says more about the teams rather than the players themselves. Real have depth, Atleti don't even have a decent second-striker.
The two biggest strikers of La Liga this season Costa and Ronaldo is about to face each other for the 4th time. Atletico is welcoming Real and aims to take revenge at their own stadium after the recent heavy knocked out in Copa Del Rey.
Ben Hayward (Goal.com) has put up some statistical analysis between the 2 leading scorers (CR7 22, Costa 21) and it shows Ronaldo to be superior. It is agreed by most of the site readers, and a lot of them (mostly CR7's fans) find it disrespectful (towards Ronaldo) to compare Costa to him.
I think this is a ridiculous comparison. And to look at the statistic and claim Costa is no where near Ronaldo is UNFAIR. Not to take any credit from Ronaldo's great run, but for the fact that, Ronaldo plays and is surrounded by one of the strongest attacking force this season (if not the strongest or 2nd strongest) so far, this statistic simply is not significant. Without Ronaldo, Real still keep winning more than 3 goals per game (even with 10 men in CL)..., but I cant imagine Atletico without Costa.
"In total, the Costa has scored 27 times in 3,033 minutes - a goal every 112.33 minutes for the Rojiblancos. While Ronaldo has 36 strikes in 33 games for Madrid - one every 79.81 minutes overall."
The two biggest strikers of La Liga this season Costa and Ronaldo is about to face each other for the 4th time. Atletico is welcoming Real and aims to take revenge at their own stadium after the recent heavy knocked out in Copa Del Rey.
Ben Hayward (Goal.com) has put up some statistical analysis between the 2 leading scorers (CR7 22, Costa 21) and it shows Ronaldo to be superior. It is agreed by most of the site readers, and a lot of them (mostly CR7's fans) find it disrespectful (towards Ronaldo) to compare Costa to him.
"In total, the Costa has scored 27 times in 3,033 minutes - a goal every 112.33 minutes for the Rojiblancos. While Ronaldo has 36 strikes in 33 games for Madrid - one every 79.81 minutes overall."
I think this is a ridiculous comparison. And to look at the statistic and claim Costa is no where near Ronaldo is UNFAIR. Not to take any credit from Ronaldo's great run, but for the fact that, Ronaldo plays and is surrounded by one of the strongest attacking force this season (if not the strongest or 2nd strongest) so far, this statistic simply is not significant. Without Ronaldo, Real still keep winning more than 3 goals per game (even with 10 men in CL)..., but I cant imagine Atletico without Costa.