Hmm...

@WTH: Hang on a sec. You're calling Bale 'one-dimensional', when he has morphed from left-back to left midfield, then left wing, and now has been playing lately as a second striker?

Often given license to roam at will, and having racked up a goal-scoring record by doing so that has (misguided, I admit) people comparing him to Ronaldo?

Come on, man. Bale may not be the 'new Ronaldo', but to call him one-dimensional seems a little hard to credit. 

@Lodatz remember when Harry Redknapp uses him on the right wing when Lennon was injured?

@WTH: Sure. And it didn't work out that well. 

This season, however, he's been deployed on the right sometimes, and scored goals from it.

I'm not arguing against you preferring Hazard; just the idea that the most versatile player in the entire Premier League is one-dimensional. ;)

Right now, Bale hands down. He is much more suited to the physicality of the league. But Hazard definitely has more potential. It's just a matter of whether that potential will be realized at Chelsea, something that doesn't happen that often.

@Lodatz I might be wrong saying he is 1 dimensional player but Bale really sucks when he is playing on right side of the field. I just checked whoscored.com and i just found out that he played 9 times behind the striker *AMC* and he scored 8 goals not bad... but anyway ill take Hazard over Bale  anyday. *Im not saying he is a bad player*

@WTH: Oh, get that. I just was doing a double-take at the one-dimensional line, is all. :)