"you spend too much time critiscizing every line i wrote"
What you mean is: I answered every line. I rather think that's a sign that what you wrote wasn't a very good argument.
"you responded to none of my questions,"
YOU JUST TOLD ME I SPENT TOO MUCH TIME ANSWERING THEM!!!
Jesus Christ, tiki.
"didnt gave any list that i can debate with you"
That's because I can't be bothered to. It doesn't mean I can't point out the flaws in someone else's list method, if they're trying to make a big point of it. You gave a list, and showed what it was based upon. I showed you that, based upon the same thing, Defoe is one of the best strikers in Europe, which makes that list kinda silly.
That's all.
"how do you rate strikers ?"
By how well they play, and by who they play against.
"Im not gonna criticize every sentence you wrote, i dont have this time or even the patience. "
That's YOUR problem, not mine. I don't feel any need to feel ashamed of the fact that I can answer your points, in detail, with ease. Some might call that having a better argument, in fact.
Look, tiki, I do believe that you're the one who started getting inappropriate here, telling people that they don't watch enough leagues, and that they are ignorant. See, when you do that, you open yourself up to criticism. I simply pointed out a flaw in your reasoning, not make a big deal out of it. YOU then made a big deal about it.
If Diego Costa is one of the best strikers in the world, for you, then fair play to you. But telling other people that they don't watch enough leagues, just because they left him out, is a little rich, and then when given your statistical reasons it sppears that Jermaine Defoe is even better than him...
Well, sorry mate, but don't blame me for you making yourself look a little silly, okay?
who are the top 5 strikers at the moment?
Here is my list