Should FIFA's Proposed Football Video Support System Be Introduced?

FIFA has recently proposed implementing the Football Video Support (FVS) system, allowing coaches to make two VAR challenges per match if they believe the referee made a mistake. VAR officials wouldn’t proactively advise the referee, and the referee could maintain their decision if they deem the coach’s challenge unwarranted. But is this innovation necessary?

FVS: The Advantages

The system allows teams to correct minor injustices over which they currently have no control. For instance, if a referee mistakenly awards a yellow card or calls for a corner instead of a goal kick, these situations can significantly impact the game. Giving coaches the ability to challenge such decisions could make matches fairer.

Even false challenges could have positive effects. From the sideline, things can look different, often leading to heated conflicts or post-match criticism of refereeing. If a coach sees upon review that the referee was correct, potential conflicts could be resolved before they escalate.

FVS: The Drawbacks

The system may be redundant because VAR officials review every critical incident. Four interruptions per game already feel excessive, and this rule could increase that number, as coaches would likely use the challenges to their full extent — even strategically, to disrupt the flow of play. This could make matches drag on even longer.

Additionally, much depends on the referee's egos. Many referees dislike admitting mistakes and might stick to their initial decisions. Instead of improving officiating quality, this could lead to more controversies and conflicts.

Should FIFA move forward with FVS, or will it only add to the chaos? The debate continues.

Published by Patrick Jane
21.11.2024